Toxicity assessment of sequential leachates of tire powder using a battery of toxicity tests and toxicity identification evaluations
Abstract
Approximately 460,000 ton of rubber are dispersed annually along the European roads due to tire wear. Tire rubber is known to leach compounds that are toxic to aquatic organisms. However, the potential effects of tire wear material on aquatic organisms at environmental relevant concentrations, and over time have so far not been extensively studied. In this study, rubber from three different tires was abraded and the powder leached in deionised water. The rubber powder was leached six times sequentially. All leachates were tested for toxicity using standardized toxicity tests including green algae (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, 72h growth inhibition), crustaceans (Daphnia magna, 24 and 48h immobility and Ceriodaphnia dubia, 48h survival and 9d reproduction and survival), and zebra fish eggs (Danio rerio, 48h lethality). The reproduction of C. dubia was the most sensitive endpoint tested, with an EC50 of 0.013 g L(-1) up to the third leaching of the most toxic tire, which is similar to a predicted concentration in road runoffs. The toxicity of all tires was reduced by the sequential leachings and after the sixth leaching the EC50s were >0.1 g L(-1) for all endpoints. Toxicity identification evaluations indicated that the toxicity was caused by zinc and organic compounds.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other leachates of concern from tire wear particles include zinc, lead, cadmium, and other toxic metals, as well as organic compounds that cause toxicity to aquatic organisms.
“Other leachates of concern from tire wear particles include zinc, lead, cadmmium, and other toxic metals, as well as organic compounds that cause toxicity to aquatic organisms (Wik et al., 2009).”
From Review of emerging contaminants in green stormwater infrastructure: antibiotic resistance genes, microplastics, tire wear particles, PFAS, and temperature (2024) · cites this paper as Wik et al., 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mayer, P. M., Moran, K. D., Miller, E. L., Brander, S. M., Harper, S., Garcia-Jaramillo, M., Carrasco-Navarro, V., Ho, K. T., Burgess, R. M., Thornton Hampton, L. M., et al. (2024) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171153 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Chibwe, L., Parrott, J. L., Shires, K., Khan, H., Clarence, S., Lavalle, C., Sullivan, C., O'Brien, A. M., De Silva, A. O., Muir, D. C. G., et al. (2022) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.5140 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
More Than a First Flush: Urban Creek Storm Hydrographs Demonstrate Broad Contaminant Pollutographs
Peter, K. T., Hou, F., Tian, Z., Wu, C., Goehring, M., Liu, F., & Kolodziej, E. P. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c00872 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Bodus, B., O'Malley, K., Dieter, G., Gunawardana, C., & McDonald, W. (2024) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167195 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Effects of polyester fibers and car tire particles on freshwater invertebrates
Schell, T., Martinez-Perez, S., Dafouz, R., Hurley, R., Vighi, M., & Rico, A. (2022) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.5337 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Kaltaev, A. Z., Slyusarsky, K. V., Gorshkov, A. S., Asilbekov, A. K., Gubin, A. V., & Larionov, K. B. (2024) · Waste and Biomass Valorization · doi:10.1007/s12649-024-02436-0 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wik, A., Nilsson, E., Källqvist, T., Tobiesen, A., & Dave, G.
- Venue
- Chemosphere
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 922-927
- ISSN
- 0045-6535
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review