Cited by 50Microplastics and Plastic PollutionEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

Effects of polyester fibers and car tire particles on freshwater invertebrates

Open access
Schell, Theresa, Martinez-Perez, Sara, Dafouz, Raquel, Hurley, Rachel, Vighi, Marco, Rico, Andreu·2022·Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Abstract

Microplastic ingestion has been shown for various organisms, but knowledge of the potential adverse effects on freshwater invertebrates remains limited. We assessed the ingestion capacity and the associated effects of polyester fibers (26-5761 µm) and car tire particles (25-75 µm) on freshwater invertebrates under acute and chronic exposure conditions. A range of microplastic concentrations was tested on Daphnia magna, Hyalella azteca, Asellus aquaticus, and Lumbriculus variegatus using water only (up to 0.15 g/L) or spiked sediment (up to 2 g/kg dry wt), depending on the habitat of the species. Daphnia magna did not ingest any fibers, but low levels of fibers were ingested by all tested benthic invertebrate species. Car tire particle ingestion rose with increasing exposure concentration for all tested invertebrates and was highest in D. magna and L. variegatus. In most cases, no statistically significant effects on mobility, survival, or reproductive output were observed after acute and chronic exposure at the tested concentrations. However, fibers affected the reproduction and survival of D. magna (no-observed-effect concentration [NOEC]: 0.15 mg/L) due to entanglement and limited mobility under chronic conditions. Car tire particles affected the reproduction (NOEC: 1.5 mg/L) and survival (NOEC: 0.15 mg/L) of D. magna after chronic exposure at concentrations in the same order of magnitude as modeled river water concentrations, suggesting that refined exposure and effect studies should be performed with these microplastics. Our results confirm that microplastic ingestion by freshwater invertebrates depends on particle shape and size and that ingestion quantity depends on the exposure pathway and the feeding strategy of the test organism. Environ Toxicol Chem 2022;41:1555-1567. © 2022 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/etc.5337

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The null effect of microplastics in this study is consistent with other community-level studies and parallels results from single-species laboratory studies that used low or environmentally relevant exposure concentrations.

    “The null effect of microplastics observed in our study not only was consistent with other community-level studies but also parallels results from single-species laboratory studies that used low-or environmentally relevant exposure concentrations (Schell et al., 2022;Wang et al., 2019).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ebert, D. (2005). Ecology, epidemiology, and evolution of parasitism in Daphnia [Internet]. National Library of Medicine (US), National Center for Biotechnology Information. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=Books
  2. Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2019). Car: An R companion to applied regression (3rd ed.). Sage.
  3. Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer‐Verlag.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schell, T., Martinez-Perez, S., Dafouz, R., Hurley, R., Vighi, M., & Rico, A.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Alcalá (ES)
  • Department of Analytical Chemistry, Physical Chemistry, and Chemical Engineering University of Alcalá Alcalá de Henares Spain
  • Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NO)
  • Universitat de València (ES)
Corresponding author
Rico, Andreu
Venue
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Published
2022-03-30
Volume
41
Issue
6
Pages
1555-1567
ISSN
  • 0730-7268 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8618
OpenAlex
W4221017515
Cited by
50
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 2
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (PCIN- 2017-016, RTC2019-007261-5, PID2019-111519RA-I00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Keywords
microplastics, polyester fibers, freshwater invertebrates, microplastic ingestion, Daphnia magna, Hyalella azteca, Asellus aquaticus, Lumbriculus variegatus, entanglement, particle size and shape, sediment exposure, acute and chronic exposure, reproductive effects, survival, mobility (physical function)
MeSH terms
Microplastics, Animals, Automobiles, Daphnia, Fresh Water, Invertebrates, Oligochaeta, Plastics, Polyesters, Water, Water Pollutants, Chemical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review