Cited by 15Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsEnvironmental Chemistry and Analysis

Use of on-site bioreactors to estimate the biotransformation rate of N-ethyl perfluorooctane sulfonamidoethanol (N-EtFOSE) during activated sludge treatment

Rhoads, Kurt R., Rostkowski, Katherine H., Kitanidis, Peter K., Criddle, Craig S.·2013·Chemosphere

Abstract

Accurate rates are needed for models that predict the fate of xenobiotic chemicals and impact of inhibitors at full-scale wastewater treatment plants. On-site rates for aerobic biotransformation of N-ethyl perfluorooctane sulfonamidoethanol (N-EtFOSE), a fluorinated repellent, were determined by continuously pumping mixed liquor from an aeration basin into two well-mixed acrylic bioreactors (4-L) operated in parallel. Known masses of N-EtFOSE and bromide were continuously added to the reactors. Reactor effluents were then monitored for bromide, N-EtFOSE, and metabolites of N-EtFOSE. Of the six transformation products reported in batch studies, only N-ethyl perfluorooctane sulfonamido acetate (N-EtFOSAA) was detected in the effluents. Bromide addition to the reactors enabled rate estimates despite variations in flow rate. Pseudo-second order rate coefficients for the N-EtFOSE biotransformation to N-EtFOSAA, predicted using a dynamic model of the reactor system, were k=2.0 and 2.4Lg(-1)VSSd(-1) for the two reactors, which are slower than the rates previously obtained using batch reactors. Given the relatively slow rate of N-EtFOSE transformation, its sorption and volatilization may be important in wastewater processes. The methodology used in this study should be suitable for similar on-site rate assessments with other contaminants or inhibitors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.04.059

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rhoads, K. R., Rostkowski, K. H., Kitanidis, P. K., & Criddle, C. S.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Rhoads, Kurt R.
Venue
Chemosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
92
Issue
6
Pages
702-707
ISSN
0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029030102
Cited by
15
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
Keywords
activated sludge, bromide tracer, pseudo-second-order kinetics, degradation intermediates
MeSH terms
Biotransformation, Bromides, Equipment Design, Fluorocarbons, Hydrocarbons, Fluorinated, Models, Biological, Sewage, Sulfonamides, Xenobiotics, Water Purification, Bioreactors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review