Cited by 48Chromium effects and bioremediationHeavy metals in environmentEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hexavalent chromium availability and phytoremediation potential of Cichorium spinosum as affect by manure, zeolite and soil ageing

Antoniadis, Vasileios, Polyzois, Theologos, Golia, Evaggelia E., Petropoulos, Spyridon A.·2017·Chemosphere

Abstract

Cichorium spinosum (spiny chicory) is a wild edible vegetable, and a possible suitable species for Cr(VI)-phytoremediation. There are three approaches for altering Cr(VI) dynamics: reduction to Cr(III) by organic matter addition, soil ageing, and Cr(VI) retention by high binding capacity materials added to soil, e.g., zeolite. Our aim was to assess spiny chicory as a phytoremediation species in relation to these three methods of altering Cr(VI) soil dynamics. There were 5 treatments: control (C); soil with 100 mg kg-1 Cr(VI) (S); soil with zeolite plus 100 mg kg-1 Cr(VI) (Z); soil with manure plus 100 mg kg-1 Cr(VI) (M); and soil added with 100 mg kg-1 Cr(VI) one year before this experiment (AS, "aged soil"). In soil, Cr(VI) was higher at S, while Z, M and AS were lower. In plant, Cr(VI) at Z, S, and AS were similar and significantly higher than M. This indicates that added manure decrease Cr(VI) availability to chicory due to the formation of organometallic complexes. However, chicory uptake amounted to 0.26-0.40 kg Cr(VI) ha-1 for Z, S, and AS, while uptake at M was lower. In conclusion, manure addition was more successful in decreasing Cr(VI) bioavailability, but it also slowed Cr(VI)-phytoremediation process.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.11.146

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Antoniadis, V., Polyzois, T., Golia, E. E., & Petropoulos, S. A.
Affiliations
University of Thessaly (GR)
Corresponding author
Antoniadis, Vasileios
Venue
Chemosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
171
Pages
729-734
ISSN
0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2560567575
Cited by
48
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Thessaly Institutional Repository (University of Thessaly) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Chromium effects and bioremediation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
Keywords
hexavalent chromium, Cichorium spinosum, manure, zeolites, soil aging, chromium bioavailability, organometallic complexes, chromium uptake, heavy metal contamination
MeSH terms
Biodegradation, Environmental, Biological Availability, Chromium, Manure, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Zeolites, Cichorium intybus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review