Cited by 186Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalWater Treatment and Disinfection

The use of carbon adsorbents for the removal of perfluoroalkyl acids from potable reuse systems

Inyang, Mandu, Dickenson, Eric R.V.·2017·Chemosphere

Abstract

Bench- and pilot-scale sorption tests were used to probe the performance of several biochars at removing perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAA) from field waters, compared to granular activated carbon (GAC). Screening tests using organic matter-free water resulted in hardwood (HWC) (K d = 41 L g -1 ) and pinewood (PWC) (K d = 49 L g -1 ) biochars having the highest perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) removal performance that was comparable to bituminous coal GAC (K d = 41 L g -1 ). PWC and HWC had a stronger affinity for PFOA sorbed in Lake Mead surface water (K F = 11 mg (1-n) L n g -1 ) containing a lower (2 mg L -1 ) dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentration than in a tertiary-filtered wastewater (K F = 8 mg (1-n) L n g -1 ) with DOC of 4.9 mg L -1 . A pilot-scale study was performed using three parallel adsorbers (GAC, anthracite, and HWC biochar) treating the same tertiary-filtered wastewater. Compared to HWC, and anthracite, GAC was the most effective in mitigating perfluoropentanoic acid (PFPnA), perfluorohexanoic acid (PHxA), PFOA, perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), and DOC (45-67% removed at 4354 bed volumes) followed by HWC, and then anthracite. Based on bench- and pilot-scale results, shorter-chain PFAA [perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA), PFPnA, or PFHxA] were more difficult to remove with both biochar and GAC than the longer-chain, PFOS and PFOA.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.05.161

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies have reported mixed results with GAC and biochar, with some reporting more effective removal of PFOA and PFOS by GAC than biochar, particularly in the presence of organic matter, while others report biochar performing as well or better than GAC.

    “Previous studies have reported mixed results with GAC and biochar with some studies reporting more effective removal of PFOA and PFOS by GAC than biochar,26 particularly in the presence of organic matter,32 while others report biochar performing as well or better than GAC.25”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Inyang, M., & Dickenson, E. R. V.
Affiliations
Southern Nevada Water Authority (US)
Corresponding author
  • Inyang, Mandu
  • Dickenson, Eric R.V.
Venue
Chemosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
184
Pages
168-175
ISSN
0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2620376440
Cited by
186
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Water Environment and Reuse Foundation (WE&RF 13-10)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
Keywords
perfluoroalkyl acids, biochar, granular activated carbon, adsorption, potable reuse, perfluorooctanoic acid, PFOS, dissolved organic carbon, wastewater treatment, sorption isotherms
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Caproates, Caprylates, Carbon, Charcoal, Fluorocarbons, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Water Purification, Wastewater

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review