The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of dyes adsorption by carbon-based adsorbent materials: Classification and analysis of last decade studies
Abstract
Carbon-based materials and their modifications have received significant attention over the last decades given the outstanding adsorption behavior toward various dyes from aqueous solutions. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the adsorption capability of dyes on carbon-based adsorbent materials (CBAMs) has been compiled. Further, the effects of process variables i.e., pH, adsorbent dosage, contact time, and initial concentration), adsorption kinetics, and isotherms were investigated while considering the classification of different groups of dyes and adsorbents. The Metafor package provides functions for conducting meta-analyses in R software. Electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were systematically searched based on Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) from January 1, 2009 to May 1, 2018. The following parameters were evaluated according to predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. After detailed screening and analysis, 835 articles were eligible for the review section. Among them, 87 studies met all quantitative criteria for the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model with a high heterogeneity (I2 = 99.99%). According to the evidence, basic dyes with n = 661 (∼50%) and powder activated carbon (PAC) sorbent with n = 752 (∼57%) have received the most attention among researchers. The results revealed that the mean of removal efficiency-based dyes classification was between 79.9 and 93.7% and the adsorption capacity was lied within the range of 76.8-303.6 mg/g. Meanwhile, the maximum adsorption capacity belongs to graphene families with Qm > 320 mg/g, while the minimum Qm was related to G and GAC with capacities of 108.5 and 110.7 mg/g, respectively. Pseudo-second-order kinetic model with 88.7% and Langmuir isotherm with 74% had the best fitting with the data studied. Baujat plot revealed that two studies (ID: 75 and 12) had the minimum influence on adsorption capacity with the highest dffits and cook's distance. According to the pooled data, the mean adsorption capacity varied between 140.90 and 208.25, with a mean of 174.57 mg/g across all studies. The results of Egger's test (t = 0.1332, p = 0.0844) and Begg's test (z = 0.8458, p = 0.3977) were not statistically significant, suggesting that no potential publication bias existed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Liu, L., Bilal, M., Duan, X., & Iqbal, H. M. N. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.390 · Cited by 318
RetractedNon-conventional low-cost adsorbents for dye removal: A review
CRINI, G. (2006) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2005.05.001 · Cited by 4,508
Verma, A. K., Dash, R. R., & Bhunia, P. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.09.012 · Cited by 1,996
Adsorptive removal of dyes from aqueous solution onto carbon nanotubes: A review
Gupta, V. K., Kumar, R., Nayak, A., Saleh, T. A., & Barakat, M. A. (2013) · Advances in Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.cis.2013.03.003 · Cited by 1,253
dos Santos, A. B., Cervantes, F. J., & van Lier, J. B. (2007) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2006.11.013 · Cited by 1,155
Graphene and graphene oxide as effective adsorbents toward anionic and cationic dyes
Ramesha, G. K., Vijaya Kumara, A., Muralidhara, H. B., & Sampath, S. (2011) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2011.05.050 · Cited by 1,119
Gong, J.-L., Wang, B., Zeng, G.-M., Yang, C.-P., Niu, C.-G., Niu, Q.-Y., Zhou, W.-J., & Liang, Y. (2009) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.09.072 · Cited by 1,057
Agricultural based activated carbons for the removal of dyes from aqueous solutions: A review
Demirbas, A. (2009) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.12.114 · Cited by 788
Singh, K., & Arora, S. (2011) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643380903218376 · Cited by 675
Removal of colorants from wastewater: A review on sources and treatment strategies
Pavithra, K. G., P., S. K., V., J., & P., S. R. (2019) · Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2019.02.011 · Cited by 634
Metadata
- Authors
- Azari, A., Nabizadeh, R., Nasseri, S., Mahvi, A. H., & Mesdaghinia, A. R.
- Venue
- Chemosphere
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-07
- Volume
- 250
- Pages
- 126238
- ISSN
- 0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3007275138
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 6.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of dyes adsorption by carbon-based adsorbent materials: Classification and analysis of last decade studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126238
- The paper
- Azari, A., Nabizadeh, R., Nasseri, S., Mahvi, A. H., & Mesdaghinia, A. R. (2020). Comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of dyes adsorption by carbon-based adsorbent materials: Classification and analysis of last decade studies. Chemosphere. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126238
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.