Cited by 149Microplastics and Plastic PollutionEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

Microplastic uptake in commercial fishes from the Bohai Sea, China

Wang, Qing, Zhu, Xiaopeng, Hou, Chaowei, Wu, Yuchen, Teng, Jia, Zhang, Chen, Tan, Haili, Shan, Encui +2 more·2021·Chemosphere

Abstract

Microplastic (MP) pollution has become an emerging global concern in marine environments, but research on the uptake of MPs by commercial marine fish is relatively sparse. In this study, 29 commercial fish species (n = 584) with different feeding habits and trophic levels were collected from 8 sites along the Bohai Sea for MP uptake analysis. Approximately 85.4% of the total fish among all species ingested MPs, and there was an average abundance of 2.14 items/individual or 0.043 items/g of wet weight. Compared with other studies, MP pollution in fishes from the Bohai Sea was relatively moderate. The MPs were predominantly fibrous in shape and were cellophane, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polypropylene (PP) in polymer composition. The highest abundance and polymer composition of MPs was observed in benthivores, suggesting that they might ingest these MPs from their food. The small fish Konosirus punctatus, which had a high level of MPs, may increase the risk of human exposure to the MPs when it is dried and consumed. Moreover, the spatial variation of MPs was determined in terms of abundance, shape composition, and major polymer types, but there was no marked relationship between MP abundance and the trophic levels of fish. Overall, this study provides a basis for the ecological risk assessment of MPs in fish and for a health risk assessment for human beings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127962

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Q., Zhu, X., Hou, C., Wu, Y., Teng, J., Zhang, C., Tan, H., Shan, E., Zhang, W., & Zhao, J.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhao, Jianmin
Venue
Chemosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
263
Pages
127962
ISSN
0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3058868328
Cited by
149
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 2
FWCI
4.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Knowledge Repository of Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, CAS (Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA23050303)
  • Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2016196)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFD0901101)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (41576122)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Keywords
microplastics, microplastic ingestion, commercial fish species, Bohai Sea, benthivorous fish, Konosirus punctatus, polyethylene terephthalate, polypropylene, cellophane, spatial variability, human health risk, environmental risk assessment, marine plastic pollution
MeSH terms
Microplastics, Animals, China, Environmental Monitoring, Environmental Pollution, Fishes, Humans, Plastics, Water Pollutants, Chemical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review