The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A state–of–the-art review on indoor air pollution and strategies for indoor air pollution control
Open accessAbstract
Indoor air pollution has traditionally received less attention than outdoors pollution despite indoors pollutant levels are typically twice higher, and people spend 80-90% of their life in increasing air-tight buildings. More than 5 million people die every year prematurely from illnesses attributable to poor indoor air quality, which also causes multi-millionaire losses due to reduced employee's productivity, material damages and increased health system expenses. Indoor air pollutants include particulate matter, biological pollutants and over 400 different chemical organic and inorganic compounds, whose concentrations are governed by several outdoor and indoor factors. Prevention of pollutant is not always technically feasible, so the implementation of cost-effective active abatement units is required. Up to date no single physical-chemical technology is capable of coping with all indoor air pollutants in a cost-effective manner. This problem requires the use of sequential technology configurations at the expenses of superior capital and operating costs. In addition, the performance of conventional physical-chemical technologies is still limited by the low concentrations, the diversity and the variability of pollutants in indoor environments. In this context, biotechnologies have emerged as a cost-effective and sustainable platform capable of coping with these limitations based on the biocatalytic action of plants, bacteria, fungi and microalgae. Indeed, biological-based purification systems can improve the energy efficiency of buildings, while providing additional aesthetic and psychological benefits. This review critically assessed the state-of-the-art of the indoor air pollution problem and prevention strategies, along with the recent advances in physical-chemical and biological technologies for indoor pollutants abatement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Satish, U., Mendell, M. J., Shekhar, K., Hotchi, T., Sullivan, D., Streufert, S., & Fisk, W. J. (2012) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1104789 · Cited by 1,064
Cited by
Sadrizadeh, S., Yao, R., Yuan, F., Awbi, H., Bahnfleth, W., Bi, Y., Cao, G., Croitoru, C., de Dear, R., Haghighat, F., et al. (2022) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104908 · Cited by 375
Asghar, N., Hussain, A., Nguyen, D. A., Ali, S., Hussain, I., Junejo, A., & Ali, A. (2024) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12951-023-02151-3 · Cited by 258
Chen, Y., Liang, Z., Li, G., & An, T. (2024) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2024.108857 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- González-Martín, J., Kraakman, N. J. R., Pérez, C., Lebrero, R., & Muñoz, R.
- Venue
- Chemosphere
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 262
- Pages
- 128376
- ISSN
- 0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3087039125
- Cited by
- 562
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A state–of–the-art review on indoor air pollution and strategies for indoor air pollution control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128376
- The paper
- González-Martín, J., Kraakman, N. J. R., Pérez, C., Lebrero, R., & Muñoz, R. (2021). A state–of–the-art review on indoor air pollution and strategies for indoor air pollution control. Chemosphere. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128376
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.