Cited by 78Child Abuse and TraumaChild Welfare and AdoptionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Training maltreating parents in elaborative and emotion-rich reminiscing with their preschool-aged children

Open access
Valentino, Kristin, Comas, Michelle, Nuttall, Amy K., Thomas, Taylor·2013·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

Objective In the current study, the effects of training maltreating parents and their preschool-aged children in elaborative and emotion-rich reminiscing were examined.Method 44 Parent-child dyads were randomly assigned to a training (reminiscing) or wait-list (control) condition. All participating parents had substantiated maltreatment and were involved with the Department of Child Services at the time of enrollment. Children were 3-6 years old (M = 4.88, SD = .99) and living in the custody of the participating parent. Dyads in the reminiscing condition received four, weekly, in-home sessions in elaborative and emotion rich reminiscing.Results At a follow-up assessment, maltreating parents in the reminiscing condition provided more high-elaborative utterances, references to children's negative emotions, and explanations of children's emotion during reminiscing than did parents in the control condition. Children in the reminiscing condition had richer memory recall and made more emotion references than did children in the control condition during reminiscing with their mothers, but not with an experimenter.Conclusion The findings suggest that maltreating parents can be taught elaborative and emotion-rich reminiscing skills, with benefits for child cognitive and emotional development. The potential clinical utility of a reminiscing-based training for maltreating families with young children is discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.02.010

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A pilot RCT found that maltreating parents given RET engaged in more elaborative, emotion-rich reminiscing after treatment (d=.64-.97) than controls, and their children had better memory and emotion discussion skills (d=.94, 1.4).

    “A pilot study randomizing dyads to receive RET or a wait-list control condition indicated that maltreating parents who received RET demonstrated greater elaborative and emotion-rich reminiscing at post-test than did parents in the control condition (d = .64–.97, respectively), and their children showed enhanced memory and ability to discuss emotions (d = .94, 1.4).”

    From Relational Interventions for Maltreated Children (2017) · cites this paper as Valentino et al., 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Valentino, K., Comas, M., Nuttall, A. K., & Thomas, T.
Affiliations
University of Notre Dame (US)
Corresponding author
Valentino, Kristin
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-08
Volume
37
Issue
8
Pages
585-595
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2117623088
Cited by
78
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001108)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR025761, RR-025761)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
preschool children, parent-child interaction, children's emotional development, child cognitive development, parent training
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Emotions, Female, House Calls, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Mother-Child Relations, Parents, Mental Recall

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review