Cited by 74Child Abuse and TraumaSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesMilitary, Security, and Education Studies

Predictors of victim disclosure in child sexual abuse: Additional evidence from a sample of incarcerated adult sex offenders

Open access
Leclerc, Benoit, Wortley, Richard·2015·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

The under-reporting of child sexual abuse by victims is a serious problem that may prolong the suffering of victims and leave perpetrators free to continue offending. Yet empirical evidence indicates that victim disclosure rates are low. In this study, we perform regression analysis with a sample of 369 adult child sexual offenders to examine potential predictors of victim disclosure. Specifically, we extend the range of previously examined potential predictors of victim disclosure and investigate interaction effects in order to better capture under which circumstances victim disclosure is more likely. The current study differs from previous studies in that it examines the impact of victim and offense variables on victim disclosure from the perspective of the offender. In line with previous studies, we found that disclosure increased with the age of the victim and if penetration had occurred. In addition, we found that disclosure increased when the victim came from a non-dysfunctional family and resisted the abuse. The presence of an interaction effect highlighted the impact of the situation on victim disclosure. This effect indicated that as victims get older, they are more likely to disclose the abuse when they are not living with the offender at the time of abuse, but less likely to do so when they are living with the offender at the time of abuse. These findings are discussed in relation to previous studies and the need to facilitate victim disclosure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.03.003

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Leclerc and Wortley (2015), disclosure increased with the age of the victim, if penetration had occurred, if the victim was related to the offender, if the victim was not living with the offender at the time of the abuse, or if the victim resisted during the offense.

    “Disclosure increased with the age of the victim: if penetration had occurred, if the victim was related to the offender, if the victim was not living with the offender at the time of the abuse, or if the victim resisted during the offense.”
  • In Leclerc and Wortley (2015), male victims and victims from dysfunctional backgrounds were less likely to disclose.

    “Male victims and victims from dysfunctional backgrounds were less likely to disclose”
  • The barrier of perpetrator relationship is especially strong when the perpetrator lives with the victim.

    “This is especially a barrier when the perpetrator lives with the victim”
  • While gender and relationship with the perpetrator are considerable factors in CSA disclosure, age is consistently a stronger predictor of disclosure or nondisclosure.

    “While gender and relationship with the perpetrator are considerable factors in CSA disclosure, age is consistently a stronger predictor of disclosure (or nondisclosure)”
  • The perpetrator residing with their victim(s) increases the likelihood of no disclosure.

    “Further, the perpetrator residing with their victim(s) increases the likelihood of no disclosure (Leclerc & Wortley, 2015).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leclerc, B., & Wortley, R.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
43
Pages
104-111
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082529026
Cited by
74
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3
FWCI
7.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
Keywords
child sexual abuse, victim disclosure, underreporting, victim age, penetration, family dysfunction, victim resistance, interaction effects, living arrangements
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prisoners, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Truth Disclosure, Crime Victims, Criminals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review