Cited by 43Child Abuse and TraumaMilitary, Security, and Education StudiesSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

Childhood disclosure of sexual abuse: Necessary but not necessarily sufficient

Swingle, Janine M., Tursich, Mischa, Cleveland, Jonathan M., Gold, Steven N., Tolliver, Sue Fields, Michaels, Landon, Kupperman-Caron, Laura N., Garcia-Larrieu, Maria +1 more·2016·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

Prevention programs often encourage sexually abused children to disclose without fully considering the potential for adverse consequences. This study examined the impact of disclosure on abuse cessation and later adult symptomatology. A clinical sample of 301 adult survivors completed the Impact of Event Scale (IES/IES-R), and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II). Participants were divided into 3 groups: Nondisclosure (n=221), Disclosure/Abuse Ended (n=25), and Disclosure/Abuse Continued (n=55). Multivariate analyses of covariance, adjusting for abuse characteristics (age of onset, penetration, and number of perpetrators) and other trauma exposure, revealed significant differences in psychiatric symptom severity among the three groups, Wilks' λ=0. 95, F (6, 584)=2.69, p=0.014, η p2=0.03. Specifically, those in the Disclosure/Abuse Continued group scored significantly higher on the IES/IES-R Intrusion subscale (p=0.04) and the BDI-II (p=0.01), as compared to the Nondisclosure group. The Disclosure/Abuse Ended group did not differ significantly from the other groups. Results suggest that disclosure may be detrimental unless adequate steps are taken to ensure abuse cessation and appropriate treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.10.009

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Swingle, J. M., Tursich, M., Cleveland, J. M., Gold, S. N., Tolliver, S. F., Michaels, L., Kupperman-Caron, L. N., Garcia-Larrieu, M., & Sciarrino, N. A.
Affiliations
Nova Southeastern University (US)
Corresponding author
Gold, Steven N.
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
62
Pages
10-18
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2534042782
Cited by
43
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
child sexual abuse, disclosure of abuse, non-disclosure, adult survivors, psychiatric symptom severity, intrusion symptoms, depression, trauma exposure, prevention programs
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Child Abuse, Sexual, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Disclosure, Disclosure, Adult Survivors of Child Abuse, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review