Cited by 404Child Abuse and TraumaSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesDeception detection and forensic psychology

Exploring the disclosure of child sexual abuse with alleged victims and their parents

Hershkowitz, Irit, Lanes, Omer, Lamb, Michael E.·2007·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

Objective The goal of the present study was to examine how children disclosed sexual abuse by alleged perpetrators who were not family members. Methodology Thirty alleged victims of sexual abuse and their parents were interviewed. The children were interviewed using the NICHD Investigative Interview Protocol by six experienced youth investigators. The same principles were followed when the parents were asked to describe in detail what had happened since the abusive incidents. The statements made by the children and parents were then content analyzed. Major characteristics of the children's and parents' reported behaviors were identified by two independent raters. Findings More than half (53%) of the children delayed disclosure for between 1 week and 2 years, fewer than half first disclosed to their parents, and over 40% did not disclose spontaneously but did so only after they were prompted; 50% of the children reported feeling afraid or ashamed of their parents' responses, and their parents indeed tended to blame the children or act angrily. The disclosure process varied depending on the children's ages, the severity and frequency of abuse, the parents' expected reactions, the suspects' identities, and the strategies they had used to foster secrecy. Conclusions The children's willingness to disclose abuse to their parents promptly and spontaneously decreased when they expected negative reactions, especially when the abuse was more serious. A strong correlation between predicted and actual parental reactions suggested that the children anticipated their parents' likely reactions very well.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.09.004

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hershkowitz, I., Lanes, O., & Lamb, M. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Haifa (IL)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Hershkowitz, Irit
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-02
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
111-123
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995449367
Cited by
400
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 16
FWCI
11.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
Keywords
child sexual abuse, disclosure, delayed disclosure, parental reactions, shame, fear, secrecy, child victims, abuse severity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Israel, Male, Parents, Truth Disclosure, Crime Victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review