Cited by 61Child Abuse and Related TraumaChild Abuse and TraumaHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

History, injury, and psychosocial risk factor commonalities among cases of fatal and near-fatal physical child abuse

Pierce, Mary Clyde, Kaczor, Kim, Acker, Deborah, Webb, Tina, Brenzel, Allen, Lorenz, Douglas J., Young, Audrey, Thompson, Richard·2017·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

Failure to recognize child maltreatment results in chronic exposure to high-risk environments where re-injury or death may occur. We analyzed a series (n=20) of fatal (n=10) and near-fatal (n=10) physical child abuse cases from the Commonwealth of Kentucky to identify commonalities and determine whether indicators of maltreatment were present prior to the child's fatal or near-fatal event. We conducted retrospective state record reviews involving children <4years of age classified as physical child abuse by the Cabinet for Health and Family Services during a 12 month period. Cases were distributed across 17 counties. IRB approvals were obtained. Three reviewers concurrently abstracted case data from medical, social, and legal documents, and descriptive statistics were analyzed. Median age of subjects was 7.5 months (range 1-32 months); 55% were male. Psychosocial risk factors (PRFs) were present in 100% of cases. Traumatic brain injury (95%) and bruising (90%) were the most common injuries. Of the 14 children with available prior medical records, 9 (64%) had sentinel injuries in the form of prior unexplained bruising; all nine suffered subsequent traumatic brain injury resulting in four deaths. A male was caring for the child at the time of the final event in 70% of cases. Our study identified key commonalities across cases of fatal and near-fatal abuse, highlighting the prevalence of psychosocial risk factors and the significance of prior unexplained bruising as a herald of escalating abuse. Further study is warranted to ascertain the predictive value of our findings in the larger population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.04.033

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pierce, M. C., Kaczor, K., Acker, D., Webb, T., Brenzel, A., Lorenz, D. J., Young, A., & Thompson, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Louisville (US)
  • Kentucky Cabinet For Health and Family Services (US)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Juvenile Protective Association (US)
Corresponding author
Pierce, Mary Clyde
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
69
Pages
263-277
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2612252737
Cited by
61
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3
FWCI
7.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Child Abuse and Related Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
child physical abuse, fatal child abuse, psychosocial risk factors, sentinel injuries, traumatic brain injury, child abuse, injury recurrence
MeSH terms
Recidivism, Child, Child Abuse, Child, Preschool, Diagnostic Errors, Female, Homicide, Humans, Infant, Kentucky, Male, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Wounds and Injuries, Prevalence, Databases, Factual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review