Cited by 74Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Abuse and TraumaBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

Witnessing intimate partner violence as a child: How boys and girls model their parents’ behaviors in adolescence

Forke, Christine M., Myers, Rachel K., Fein, Joel A., Catallozzi, Marina, Localio, A. Russell, Wiebe, Douglas J., Grisso, Jeane Ann·2018·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

Childhood witnesses of adult violence at home are at risk for future violence. It is unclear how gender of the child and adult perpetrator are related to adolescent relationship violence. We explore how childhood witnessing of same-gender, opposite-gender, and bidirectional violence perpetrated by adults is associated with adolescent relationship violence victimization only, perpetration only, and combined victimization/perpetration for male and female undergraduates. We gathered cross-sectional data from 907 undergraduates attending 67 randomly-selected classes at three distinct East-Coast colleges using pencil-and-paper surveys administered at the end of class time. Multiple imputation with chained equations was used to impute missing data. Multinomial regression models controlling for gender, age, race, school, and community violence predicted adolescent outcomes for each witnessing exposure; relative risk ratios and average adjusted probabilities with 95% confidence intervals are presented. Adolescent relationship violence outcomes vary based on gender of the child witness and adult perpetrator. Witnessing adult males perpetrate is associated with higher perpetration for boys and higher combined victimization/perpetration for girls. Witnessing adult females perpetrate - either as the sole perpetrator or in a mutually violent relationship with an adult male - increases risk for combined victimization/perpetration for boys and girls during adolescence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.07.031

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the majority of studies that generated counter-predictive findings, the authors justified the findings within the same theoretical framework and supported such justifications with methodological and contextual limitations.

    “It is therefore not surprising that in the majority of the studies that generated counter-predictive findings, the authors justified the findings within the same theoretical framework, and supported such justifications with methodological and contextual limitations (Craft & Serovich, 2005; Eriksson & Mazerolle, 2015; Forke et al., 2018; Gover et al., 2008; Shields et al., 2020).”
  • Four studies were informed by attachment theory suggesting that a lack of parental attachment or decreased support during adolescence may increase the risk for combined victimization or perpetration for children who witnessed violence in the family-of-origin.

    “Four studies were informed by attachment theory suggesting that a lack of parental attachment or decreased support during adolescence may increase the risk for combined victimization or perpetration for children who witnessed violence in the family-of-origin (Forke et al., 2018).”
  • Evidence from some included studies on the effects of child maltreatment and the link between exposure to IPV and later IPV perpetration highlights a potential case for multi-theory examination.

    “Evidence from some of the included studies on the effects of child maltreatment and the link between exposure to IPV and later IPV perpetration highlight a potential case for multi-theory examination (Eriksson & Mazerolle, 2015; Forke et al., 2018; Shields et al., 2020), as it shows the impact of poly-victimization experiences on IPV transmission (Emery et al., 2022; Finkelhor et al., 2007).”
  • The utilization of SLT theory in IPV research corroborates claims that the theory is useful for learning about behavioral modeling and transmission of observed behaviors.

    “On the surface, the utilization of SLT theory in IPV research corroborates claims that the theory is useful for learning about behavioral modeling and transmission of observed behaviors (Copp et al., 2019; Forke et al., 2018; Valgardson & Schwartz, 2019).”
  • Three studies from the United States found that IPV exposure increased the likelihood of IPV perpetration for men, and higher victimization rates for exposed women.

    “Three studies from the United States (Forke et al., 2018, 2021; Heyman & Smith Slep, 2002) found similar results supporting IPV exposure increasing the likelihood of IPV perpetration for men, and higher victimization rates for exposed women.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Forke, C. M., Myers, R. K., Fein, J. A., Catallozzi, M., Localio, A. R., Wiebe, D. J., & Grisso, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Forke, Christine M.
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
84
Pages
241-252
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2888018315
Cited by
74
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Claneil Foundation
  • Valentine Foundation
  • Craig-Dalsimer Fund
  • Mary D. Ames Chair for Child Advocacy
  • Institute for Safe Families (ISF)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
intimate partner violence, gender differences, victimization, perpetration, parental violence, bidirectional violence, university students
MeSH terms
Intimate Partner Violence, Exposure to Violence, Adolescent, Adult, Aggression, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Parents, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Schools, Students, Crime Victims, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review