Cited by 28Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesChild Abuse and TraumaMilitary, Security, and Education Studies

College students' recollections of childhood sexual abuse prevention programs and their potential impact on reduction of sexual victimization

Kenny, Maureen C., Helpingstine, Claire, Long, Haiying·2020·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

Background Child sexual abuse prevention programs are offered in many schools globally, but research is scant on whether or not these programs actually decrease the rates of CSA among youth who participate in them. Objective This study sought to determine if participation in a CSA prevention program (based on participant recall), in the US or another country, led to lower rates of self-reported past victimization among youth, affected disclosure and effects on sexual satisfaction. Participants and setting One thousand five hundred and two students from an ethnically and racially diverse university in the southeast served as participants. Methods Participants completed measures on line (Qualtrics). This included demographic information and participation in CSA prevention programs in schools, concepts that were covered, and recollections of sexual victimization. The second measure was a revised version of the sexual satisfaction scale (Derogatis Sexual Functioning Inventory). Results Students who had not participated in a CSA prevention program were significantly more likely to be abused than those who did participate, regardless of the program or location (χ2 (1,1498) = 19.01, p < .001). Those participating in programs in the US were more likely to disclose abuse than those participating in the programs in other countries (χ2 (1,212) = 5.49, p = .019). No significant difference was found between those who participated in prevention programming and those who did not on sexual satisfaction (χ2 (1,1469) = 1.76, p = .184). Conclusion These results highlight the importance of universal CSA prevention programs in schools worldwide as one part of comprehensive prevention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104486

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kenny, M. C., Helpingstine, C., & Long, H.
Affiliations
Florida International University (US)
Corresponding author
Kenny, Maureen C.
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
104
Pages
104486
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3016108932
Cited by
26
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6
FWCI
5.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
Keywords
child sexual abuse, school-based prevention, university students, disclosure of abuse, sexual satisfaction, universal prevention, prevention program effectiveness
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child Abuse, Sexual, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Mental Recall, Sexual Behavior, Students, Universities, Crime Victims, Young Adult, Bullying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review