Cited by 147Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesChild Abuse and TraumaBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

The effectiveness of victimization prevention instruction: An evaluation of children's responses to actual threats and assaults

Finkelhor, David, Asdigian, Nancy, Dziuba-Leatherman, Jennifer·1995·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

This study examined whether instruction in school and at home about how to prevent victimization has any impact on children's behavior in situations of real victimization threat. Telephone interviews were conducted in 1992 with a nationally representative sample of 2,000 youths age 10 to 16 and their caretakers. More comprehensive school programs had mixed, small but overall positive effects. Children exposed to such school-based prevention programs performed better on a short test of knowledge about sexual victimization; when victimized or threatened were more likely to use the self-protection strategies recommended by prevention educators; were more likely to feel that they had been successful in protecting themselves; and were more likely to disclose to someone about the victimization attempts. They were not better able to limit the seriousness of the assaults and, in fact, they experienced more injuries in the course of sexual assaults. Comprehensive parental instruction also had positive effects on knowledge, the use of preferred self-protection strategies and the likelihood of disclosure. Children with comprehensive parental instruction were more likely to limit the seriousness of assaults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0145-2134(94)00112-8

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 16 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Finkelhor, D., Asdigian, N., & Dziuba-Leatherman, J.
Affiliations
University of New Hampshire (US)
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-02
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
141-153
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170274357
Cited by
146
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
13.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
victimization prevention, child sexual abuse, school-based prevention, parental instruction, self-protection strategies, disclosure of victimization
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Child Abuse, Sexual, Female, Health Education, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Parents, Self Disclosure, United States, Wounds and Injuries, Program Evaluation, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review