Cited by 47Child Abuse and TraumaIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceMilitary, Security, and Education Studies

Using latent class analysis to empirically classify maltreatment according to the developmental timing, duration, and co-occurrence of abuse types

Open access
Ziobrowski, Hannah N., Buka, Stephen L., Austin, S. Bryn, Sullivan, Adam J., Horton, Nicholas J., Simone, Melissa, Field, Alison E.·2020·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

Background Individuals can have vastly different maltreatment experiences depending on the types, developmental timing, and duration of abuse. Women and men may be differentially affected by distinct abuse patterns.Objective To examine whether maltreatment subgroups could be identified based on the types, developmental timing, and duration of abuse, and to determine their prevalence among a large, community-based sample. We also examined sex differences in associations of maltreatment subgroups with adverse health outcomes.Participants and setting Data came from 9310 women and men (95 % White) in the United States who responded to the Growing Up Today Study questionnaire in 2007 (aged 19-27 years).Methods Participants reported on physical, sexual, and emotional abuse occurring in childhood (before age 11 years) and adolescence (ages 11-17 years). We conducted latent class (LC) analyses using indicators for child and adolescent abuse. We examined associations of LCs with health outcomes using sex-stratified log-binomial models with generalized estimated equations.Results We identified five LCs characterized by: 1) no/low abuse (59 %), 2) child physical abuse (16 %), 3) adolescent emotional abuse (9%), 4) child and adolescent physical and emotional abuse (16 %), and 5) child and adolescent sexual abuse (1%). LCs were uniquely associated adult health outcomes among both women and men. Associations of LCs with eating disorder behaviors appeared stronger for men than women.Conclusions Individuals experience distinct patterns of maltreatment based on the types, developmental timing, and duration of abuse. These patterns are uniquely associated with adverse health outcomes in adulthood, and can be identified using LCA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104574

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Childhood sexual abuse has been found to characterize a distinct sub-group of victimized young women in community populations who differ from other sub-groups whose members experienced either or both physical or emotional abuse but not sexual abuse.

    “On the other hand, childhood sexual abuse has been found to characterize a distinct sub-group of victimized young women in community populations who differ from other sub-groups whose members experienced either or both physical or emotional abuse but not sexual abuse [195].”

    From Complex PTSD and borderline personality disorder (2021) · cites this paper as [195]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • If any abuse is identified in children or adolescents, it is likely they have also previously experienced, are currently experiencing, or are at risk for experiencing additional forms of abuse.

    “If any abuse is identified in children or adolescents, it is likely they have also previously experienced, are currently experiencing, or are at risk for experiencing additional forms of abuse [119]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ziobrowski, H. N., Buka, S. L., Austin, S. B., Sullivan, A. J., Horton, N. J., Simone, M., & Field, A. E.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Amherst College (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Ziobrowski, Hannah N.
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
107
Pages
104574
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3035378459
Cited by
47
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Maternal and Child Health Bureau
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
Keywords
child abuse, abuse patterns, physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, sex differences, eating disorder behaviors, adult health outcomes, Growing Up Today Study, latent class analysis
MeSH terms
Latent Class Analysis, Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Prevalence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review