Cited by 175Child Welfare and AdoptionYouth Education and Societal DynamicsChildren's Rights and Participation

Why youth leave care: Understandings of adulthood and transition successes and challenges among youth aging out of child welfare

Goodkind, Sara, Schelbe, Lisa A., Shook, Jeffrey J.·2011·Children and Youth Services Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.01.010

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goodkind, S., Schelbe, L. A., & Shook, J. J.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Goodkind, Sara
Venue
Children and Youth Services Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
1039-1048
ISSN
0190-7409 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003650291
Cited by
175
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
19.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Children and Youth Services Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
Keywords
young people leaving care, coming of age, autonomy and independence, child welfare policy, youth development, supportive relationships, child welfare involvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review