Cited by 26Child Welfare and AdoptionPoverty, Education, and Child WelfareHomelessness and Social Issues

Poverty to more poverty: An evaluation of transition services provided to adolescent girls from two institutions in Zimbabwe

Mhongera, Pamhidzayi Berejena, Lombard, Antoinette·2016·Children and Youth Services Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.03.013

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mhongera, P. B., & Lombard, A.
Affiliations
University of Pretoria (ZA)
Corresponding author
Mhongera, Pamhidzayi Berejena
Venue
Children and Youth Services Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-05
Volume
64
Pages
145-154
ISSN
0190-7409 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2312050845
Cited by
26
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Children and Youth Services Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
Keywords
transition services, adolescent girls, institutional care, care leavers, sustainable livelihoods, poverty, livelihood assets, child welfare services, coming of age, Zimbabwe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review