Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 451

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Obese Individuals with and without Type 2 Diabetes Show Different Gut Microbial Functional Capacity and Composition

Open access
Thingholm, Louise B., Rühlemann, Malte C., Koch, Manja, Fuqua, Brie, Laucke, Guido, Boehm, Ruwen, Bang, Corinna, Franzosa, Eric A., Hübenthal, Matthias, Rahnavard, Ali, Frost, Fabian, Lloyd-Price, Jason, Schirmer, Melanie, Lusis, Aldons J., Vulpe, Chris D., Lerch, Markus M., Homuth, Georg, Kacprowski, Tim, Schmidt, Carsten O., Nöthlings, Ute, Karlsen, Tom H., Lieb, Wolfgang, Laudes, Matthias, Franke, Andre, Huttenhower, Curtis·2019·Cell Host & Microbe

Abstract

SUMMARY Obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are metabolic disorders that are linked to microbiome alterations. However, their co-occurrence poses challenges in disentangling microbial features unique to each condition. We analyzed gut microbiomes of lean non-diabetic (n = 633), obese non-diabetic (n = 494), and obese individuals with T2D (n = 153) from German population and metabolic disease cohorts. Microbial taxonomic and functional profiles were analyzed along with medical histories, serum metabolomics, biometrics, and dietary data. Obesity was associated with alterations in microbiome composition, individual taxa, and functions with notable changes in Akkermansia, Faecalibacterium, Oscillibacter, and Alistipes, as well as in serum metabolites that correlated with gut microbial patterns. However, microbiome associations were modest for T2D, with nominal increases in Escherichia/Shigella. Medications, including antihypertensives and antidiabetics, along with dietary supplements including iron, were significantly associated with microbiome variation. These results differentiate microbial components of these interrelated metabolic diseases and identify dietary and medication exposures to consider in future studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chom.2019.07.004

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 90 references

Cited by

See all 451

Metadata

Authors
Thingholm, L. B., Rühlemann, M. C., Koch, M., Fuqua, B., Laucke, G., Boehm, R., Bang, C., Franzosa, E. A., Hübenthal, M., Rahnavard, A., Frost, F., Lloyd-Price, J., Schirmer, M., Lusis, A. J., Vulpe, C. D., Lerch, M. M., Homuth, G., Kacprowski, T., Schmidt, C. O., Nöthlings, U., Karlsen, T. H., Lieb, W., Laudes, M., Franke, A., & Huttenhower, C.
Venue
Cell Host & Microbe
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
252-264.e10
ISSN
1931-3128 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2964698358
Cited by
451
References
90
FWCI
14.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Obese Individuals with and without Type 2 Diabetes Show Different Gut Microbial Functional Capacity and Composition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.chom.2019.07.004
The paper
Thingholm, L. B., Rühlemann, M. C., Koch, M., Fuqua, B., Laucke, G., Boehm, R., Bang, C., Franzosa, E. A., Hübenthal, M., Rahnavard, A., Frost, F., Lloyd-Price, J., Schirmer, M., Lusis, A. J., Vulpe, C. D., Lerch, M. M., Homuth, G., Kacprowski, T., Schmidt, C. O., . . . Huttenhower, C. (2019). Obese Individuals with and without Type 2 Diabetes Show Different Gut Microbial Functional Capacity and Composition. Cell Host & Microbe. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2019.07.004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.