Cited by 614Gut microbiota and healthOral microbiology and periodontitis researchMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology

Host variables confound gut microbiota studies of human disease

Open access
Vujkovic-Cvijin, Ivan, Sklar, Jack, Jiang, Lingjing, Natarajan, Loki, Knight, Rob, Belkaid, Yasmine·2020·Nature

Abstract

Low concordance between studies that examine the role of microbiota in human diseases is a pervasive challenge that limits the capacity to identify causal relationships between host-associated microorganisms and pathology. The risk of obtaining false positives is exacerbated by wide interindividual heterogeneity in microbiota composition 1, probably due to population-wide differences in human lifestyle and physiological variables 2 that exert differential effects on the microbiota. Here we infer the greatest, generalized sources of heterogeneity in human gut microbiota profiles and also identify human lifestyle and physiological characteristics that, if not evenly matched between cases and controls, confound microbiota analyses to produce spurious microbial associations with human diseases. We identify alcohol consumption frequency and bowel movement quality as unexpectedly strong sources of gut microbiota variance that differ in distribution between healthy participants and participants with a disease and that can confound study designs. We demonstrate that for numerous prevalent, high-burden human diseases, matching cases and controls for confounding variables reduces observed differences in the microbiota and the incidence of spurious associations. On this basis, we present a list of host variables that we recommend should be captured in human microbiota studies for the purpose of matching comparison groups, which we anticipate will increase robustness and reproducibility in resolving the members of the gut microbiota that are truly associated with human disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-020-2881-9

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Matching cases and controls for confounding variables can reduce differences in the microbiota and increase robustness and reproducibility in identifying bacterial taxa that are truly associated with human disease.

    “Matching cases and controls for confounding variables can reduce differences in the microbiota, and increase robustness and reproducibility in identifying bacterial taxa that are truly associated with human disease [104].”

    From Gut microbiota-mediated immunomodulation in tumor (2021) · cites this paper as [104]

  • Host variables such as alcohol intake frequency and bowel movement quality could exert great influence on microbial composition.

    “host variables, such as alcohol intake frequency and bowel movement quality, could exert great influence on microbial composition [104].”

    From Gut microbiota-mediated immunomodulation in tumor (2021) · cites this paper as [104]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vujkovic-Cvijin, I., Sklar, J., Jiang, L., Natarajan, L., Knight, R., & Belkaid, Y.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
  • Vujkovic-Cvijin, Ivan
  • Belkaid, Yasmine
Venue
Nature
Published
2020-11-04
Volume
587
Issue
7834
Pages
448-454
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W3097338697
Cited by
614
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 114 · 2025: 90 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 129 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
25.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (ZIAAI001115, ZIAAI001132)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK110541)
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (DP1AT010885)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Keywords
gut microbiota, individual heterogeneity, alcohol consumption, case-control matching, reproducibility
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Machine Learning, Data Analysis, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alcohol Drinking, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Disease, Feces, Female, Gastrointestinal Motility, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Residence Characteristics, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, ROC Curve, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Body Mass Index, Case-Control Studies, Area Under Curve, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review