Cited by 5Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthCancer, Lipids, and MetabolismPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions

Management Strategies for Statin-Associated Muscle Symptoms: How Useful Is Same-Statin Rechallenge?

Brennan, Emily T., Joy, Tisha R.·2017·Canadian Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Background Statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) are common. Rechallenge with the same statin (same-statin rechallenge) has recently been included as part of a proposed scoring index for diagnosing SAMS, but data regarding tolerability and efficacy of same-statin rechallenge, compared with other strategies, is minimal. In this study we evaluated the tolerability, percent change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and proportion of patients achieving their LDL-C targets among 3 common management strategies-same-statin rechallenge, switching to a different statin (statin switch), and use of nonstatin medications only. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 118 patients referred to our tertiary care centre for management of SAMS, defined as development of muscle-related symptoms with 2 or more statins. Baseline and last follow-up lipid parameters were documented. Patients were classified as tolerant of a strategy if, at their last follow-up, they remained on that strategy. Results After a median follow-up of 17 months, most (n = 79; 67%) patients were able to tolerate a statin. Tolerability was similar among the 3 treatment strategies (71% same-statin rechallenge vs 53% statin switch vs 57% for nonstatin therapy only; P = 0.11). Those in the same-statin rechallenge and statin switch groups achieved greater LDL-C reductions compared with those who only tolerated nonstatins (-38.8 ± 3.4% vs -36.4 ± 2.9% vs -17.3 ± 4.5%; P = 0.0007). A greater proportion of…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.02.013

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brennan, E. T., & Joy, T. R.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Joy, Tisha R.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
666-673
ISSN
0828-282X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2593300661
Cited by
5
References
7
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly Canada
  • Merck
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Sanofi
  • Amgen
  • AstraZeneca
  • Boehringer Ingelheim
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Keywords
statin-associated muscle symptoms, statin intolerance, statin switching, non-statin lipid-lowering therapy, LDL cholesterol lowering, LDL-C goal attainment, statin tolerability
MeSH terms
Aged, Canada, Female, Humans, Hypercholesterolemia, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Muscular Diseases, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Lipid Metabolism, Medication Therapy Management, Drug Substitution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review