CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 139Geotechnical Engineering and Soil StabilizationConcrete and Cement Materials ResearchGeotechnical and construction materials studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Durability of lightweight alkali-activated ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) stabilized clayey soils subjected to sulfate attack

Jiang, Ning-Jun, Du, Yan-Jun, Liu, Kai·2018·Applied Clay Science
DOI 10.1016/j.clay.2018.04.014
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clay.2018.04.014

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 139

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Aguilar, 2010, Lightweight concretes of activated metakaolin-fly ash binders, with blast furnace slag aggregates, Constr. Build. Mater., 24, 1166, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.12.024 · DOI
  2. Arulrajah, 2016, Spent coffee grounds-fly ash geopolymer used as an embankment structural fill material, J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001496 · DOI
  3. Arulrajah, 2016, Stabilization of recycled demolition aggregates by geopolymers comprising calcium carbide, fly ash and slag precursors, Constr. Build. Mater., 114, 864, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.150 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bakharey, 2005, Durability of geopolymer materials in sodium and magnisum sulfate solutions, Cem. Concr. Res., 35, 1233, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.09.002 · DOI
  5. Chen, 2007, The hydration of slag, part 1: reaction models for alkali-activated slag, J. Mater. Sci., 42, 428, 10.1007/s10853-006-0873-2 · DOI
  6. Du, 2016, Field evaluation of soft highway subgrade soil stabilized with calcium carbide residue, Soils Found., 56, 301, 10.1016/j.sandf.2016.02.012 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Du, 2017, Physical, hydraulic, and mechanical properties of clayey soil stabilized by lightweight alkali-activated slag geopolymer, J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 29, 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001743 · DOI
  8. Fu, 2008, Mechanical behavior of soil cement under ambient with sulfate conditions, Rock Soil Mech., 29, 659
  9. Gao, 2005, ITZ microstructure of concrete containing GGBS, Cem. Concr. Res., 25, 1299, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.042 · DOI
  10. Gu, 2014, Mechanical and hydration properties of ground granulated blast furnace slag pastes activated with MgO-CaO mixtures, Constr. Build. Mater., 69, 101, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.032 · DOI
  11. Haha, 2011, Influence of slag chemistry on the hydration of alkali-activated blast-furnace slag—part I: effect of MgO, Cem. Concr. Res., 41, 955, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.05.002 · DOI
  12. He, 1995, Pozzolanic reactions of six principal clay minerals: activation, reactivity assessments and technological effects, Cem. Concr. Res., 25, 1691, 10.1016/0008-8846(95)00165-4 · DOI
  13. Horpibulsuk, 2012, Strength and compressibility of lightweight cemented clays, Appl. Clay Sci., 69, 11, 10.1016/j.clay.2012.08.006 · DOI
  14. Horpibulsuk, 2012, Soil stabilization by calcium carbide residue and fly ash, J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 24, 184, 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000370 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Horpibulsuk, 2013, Compressibility of lightweight cemented clays, Eng. Geol., 159, 59, 10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.03.020 · DOI
  16. Horpibulsuk, 2014, Water-void to cement ratio identity of lightweight cellular-cemented material, J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 26, 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001110 · DOI
  17. Hoy, 2017, Effect of wetting-drying cycles on compressive strength and microstructure of recycled asphalt pavement - fly ash geopolymer, Constr. Build. Mater., 144, 624, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.243 · DOI
  18. Jiang, 2016, Multi-scale laboratory evaluation of the physical, mechanical, and microstructural properties of soft highway subgrade soil stabilized with calcium carbide residue, Can. Geotech. J., 53, 373, 10.1139/cgj-2015-0245 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Jin, 2013, Thermogravimetric study on the hydration of reactive magnesia and silica mixture at room temperature, Thermochim. Acta, 566, 162, 10.1016/j.tca.2013.05.036 · DOI
  20. Jin, 2015, Strength and hydration properties of reactive MgO-activated ground granulated blast furnace slag paste, Cem. Concr. Compos., 57, 8, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.10.007 · DOI
  21. Jin, 2016, Three-yearperformance of in-situ solidified/stabilised soil using novel MgO-bearingbinders, Chemosphere, 144, 681, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.09.046 · DOI
  22. Kamon, 1993, Utilization of stainless-steel slag by cement hardening, Soils Found., 33, 118, 10.3208/sandf1972.33.3_118 · DOI
  23. Knapen, 2009, Cement hydration and microstructure formation in the presence of water-soluble polymers, Cem. Concr. Res., 39, 6, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.10.003 · DOI
  24. Łukowski, 2015, Durability of mortars containing ground granulated blast-furnace slag in acid and sulphate environment, Procedia Eng., 108, 47, 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.06.118 · DOI
  25. Maghool, 2017, Laboratory evaluation of ladle furnace slag in unbound pavement base/subbase applications, J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 29, 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001724 · DOI
  26. Nagendra, 2016, Particle size effect of ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) in cement concrete, Inter. J. Recent Trends Eng. Res., 2, 6
  27. Naik, 2017, Experimental study on strength and durability characteristics of ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) concrete Mix 50, Inter. J. Eng. Res. Adv. Technol., 3, 69
  28. Neramitkornburi, 2015, Engineering properties of lightweight cellular cemented clay-fly ash material, Soils Found., 55, 471, 10.1016/j.sandf.2015.02.020 · DOI
  29. Ng, 2017, Removal of hydrogen sulfide using soil amended with ground granulated blast-furnace slag, J. Environ. Eng., 143, 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001206 · DOI
  30. Özbay, 2016, Utilization and efficiency of ground granulated blast furnace slag on concrete properties – a review, Constr. Build. Mater., 105, 423, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.153 · DOI
  31. Pacheco-Torgal, 2008, Alkali-activated binders: a review part 1. Historical background, terminology, reaction mechanisms and hydration products, Constr. Build. Mater., 22, 1305, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.10.015 · DOI
  32. Pal, 2003, Investigation of hydraulic activity of ground granulated blast furnace slag in concrete, Cem. Concr. Res., 33, 1481, 10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00062-0 · DOI
  33. Pane, 2005, Investigation of blended cement hydration by isothermal calorimetry and thermal analysis, Cem. Concr. Res., 35, 1155, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.10.027 · DOI
  34. Puppala, 2004, Studies on sulfate-resistant cement stabilization methods to address sulfate-induced soil heave, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 130, 391, 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:4(391) · DOI
  35. Rajasekaran, 2005, Sulphate attack in lime-treated marine clay, Mar. Georesour. Geotechnol., 23, 93, 10.1080/10641190590944926 · DOI
  36. Ranjani, 2012, Behaviour of foam concrete under sulphate environments, Cem. Concr. Compos., 34, 825, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.03.007 · DOI
  37. Rollings, 1999, Sulfate attack on cement-stabilized sand, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 125, 364, 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:5(364) · DOI
  38. Santhanam, 2003, Mechanism of sulfate attack: a fresh look: part 2. Proposed mechanisms, Cem. Concr. Res., 33, 341, 10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00958-4 · DOI
  39. Sukmak, 2015, Sulfate resistance of clay-Portland cement and clay-high calcium fly ash geopolymer, J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 27, 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001112 · DOI
  40. Suksiripattanapong, 2015, Unit weight, strength and microstructure of a water treatment sludge-fly ash lightweight cellular geopolymer, Constr. Build. Mater., 94, 807, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.091 · DOI
  41. Tian, 2000, Does gypsum formation during sulfate attack on concrete lead to expansion?, Cem. Concr. Res., 30, 117, 10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00211-2 · DOI
  42. Wild, 1998, Effects of partial substitution of lime with ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) on the strength propertiesof lime-stabilized sulphate-bearing clay soils, Eng. Geol., 51, 37, 10.1016/S0013-7952(98)00039-8 · DOI
  43. Wu, 2018, Leaching and microstructuralproperties of lead contaminated kaolin stabilized by GGBS-MgO in semi-dynamic leachingtests, Constr. Buil. Mater., 172, 626, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.164 · DOI
  44. Yi, 2015, Microstructural and mechanical properties of marine soft clay stabilized by lime-activated ground granulated blast furnace slag, Appl. Clay Sci., 103, 71, 10.1016/j.clay.2014.11.005 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Yi, 2015, Alkali-activated ground-granulated blast furnace slag for stabilization of marine soft clay, J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 27, 04014146, 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001100 · DOI
  46. Yi, 2015, Comparison of reactive magnesia- and carbide slag-activated ground granulated blast furnace slag and Portland cement for stabilisation of a natural soil, Appl. Clay Sci., 111, 21, 10.1016/j.clay.2015.03.023 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Yi, 2016, Magnesia reactivity on activating efficacy for ground granulated blast furnace slag for soft clay stabilization, Appl. Clay Sci., 126, 57, 10.1016/j.clay.2016.02.033 · DOI
  48. Yu, 2016, Multiscale study of sodium sulfate soaking durability of low plastic clay stabilized by reactive magnesia-activated ground granulated blast-furnace slag, J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 28, 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001517 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Jiang, N.-J., Du, Y.-J., & Liu, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • Southeast University (CN)
Corresponding author
Du, Yan-Jun
ORCID
Venue
Applied Clay Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
161
Pages
70-75
ISSN
0169-1317 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.clay.2018.04.014
OpenAlex
W2800002197
Cited by
139
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2
FWCI
9.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Applied Clay Science (publishedVersion)
  • Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Primary Research & Development Plan of Jiangsu Province (BE2017715)
  • Environmental Protection Scientific Research Project of Jiangsu Province (2016031)
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017M621595)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical and construction materials studies
Keywords
soil stabilization, clay soil, sulfate attack, durability, sodium silicate, calcium carbide residue, air foam, unconfined compressive strength, water absorption, thermogravimetric analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review