Cited by 132Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesColorectal Cancer Surgical TreatmentsGenetic factors in colorectal cancer

Progression-Free Survival Remains Poor Over Sequential Lines of Systemic Therapy in Patients With BRAF-Mutated Colorectal Cancer

Open access
Morris, Van, Overman, Michael J., Jiang, Zhi-Qin, Garrett, Christopher, Agarwal, Shweta, Eng, Cathy, Kee, Bryan, Fogelman, David +4 more·2014·Clinical Colorectal Cancer

Abstract

Background BRAF mutations occur in 5% to 10% of metastatic colorectal cancers and are biomarkers associated with a poor prognosis. However, the outcomes with standard chemotherapy over sequential lines of therapy in a large cohort of patients with BRAF-mutant tumors have not been described. Patients and methods We searched the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center databases for patients with colorectal cancer and identified BRAF mutations between December 2003 and May 2012. Patients were analyzed for clinical characteristics, PFS, overall survival, and chemotherapeutic agents used. Survival was estimated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Among the 1567 patients tested for BRAF mutations at our institution, 127 (8.1%) had tumors with BRAF mutations. The 71 patients who presented with metastatic disease received a median of 2 lines of chemotherapy. For the first 3 lines of chemotherapy, median PFS was 6.3 months (n = 69 patients; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.9-7.7 months), 2.5 months (n = 58 patients; 95% CI, 1.8-3.0 months), and 2.6 months (n = 31 patients; 95% CI, 1.0-4.2 months), respectively. Median PFS was not affected by the backbone chemotherapeutic agent in the first-line setting, whether oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based (6.4 months vs. 5.4 months, respectively; P = .99). Conclusion PFS is expectedly poor for patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer. Despite the ascertainment bias present (with testing preferentially performed in patients suitable for clinical trials in refractory disease), these data provide historic controls suitable for future study design and support the idea that novel therapeutic options are essential in this population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clcc.2014.06.001

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BRAFV600E mutations are present in around 10% of advanced CRC patients and lead to constitutive activation of the MAPK pathway, drug resistance and a poor prognosis.

    “BRAFV600E mutations are present in around 10% of advanced CRC patients and lead to constitutive activation of the MAPK pathway, drug resistance and a poor prognosis [1–4].”

    From Co-targeting SRC overcomes resistance to BRAF inhibitors in colorectal cancer (2025) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Introduction (page not specified) reports BRAF mutations in 5%–10% of all colorectal tumors, identifies V600E as the most common mutation, and links BRAF mutations to constitutive MAPK activation and poor survival. It also reports low treatment response rates, but does not establish that V600E causes drug resistance; its prevalence estimate is for all colorectal tumors, not specifically advanced CRC. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • BRAFV600E mutations occur in approximately 10% of colorectal cancer patients and are associated with poor prognosis.

    “BRAFV600E mutations occur in ∼10% of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, leading to poor prognosis.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. [1]Siegel R DeSantis C Virgo K Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012 CA Cancer J. Clin 2012 Jul-Aug 62 4 220 241 22700443
  2. [2]Nordlinger B Sorbye H Glimelius B Perioperative chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC Intergroup trial 40983): a randomised controlled trial Lancet 2008 3 22 371 9617 1007 1016 18358928 PMC2277487
  3. [3]Andre T Louvet C Maindrault-Goebel F CPT-11 (irinotecan) addition to bimonthly, high-dose leucovorin and bolus and continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) for pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer. GERCOR Eur. J. Cancer 1999 9 35 9 1343 1347 10658525
  4. [4]Fuchs CS Marshall J Mitchell E Randomized, controlled trial of irinotecan plus infusional, bolus, or oral fluoropyrimidines in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the BICC-C Study J. Clin. Oncol 2007 10 20 25 30 4779 4786 17947725
  5. [5]Kabbinavar F Hurwitz HI Fehrenbacher L Phase II, randomized trial comparing bevacizumab plus fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) with FU/LV alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer J. Clin. Oncol 2003 1 1 21 1 60 65 12506171
  6. [6]Hurwitz H Fehrenbacher L Novotny W Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer N. Engl. J. Med 2004 6 3 350 23 2335 2342 15175435
  7. [7]Fong Y Cohen AM Fortner JG Liver resection for colorectal metastases J. Clin. Oncol 1997 3 15 3 938 946 9060531
  8. [8]Choti MA Sitzmann JV Tiburi MF Trends in long-term survival following liver resection for hepatic colorectal metastases Ann. Surg 2002 6 235 6 759 766 12035031 PMC1422504
  9. [9]Kopetz S Chang GJ Overman MJ Improved survival in metastatic colorectal cancer is associated with adoption of hepatic resection and improved chemotherapy J. Clin. Oncol 2009 8 1 27 22 3677 3683 19470929 PMC2720081
  10. [11]Douillard J-Y Siena S Cassidy J Final results from PRIME: randomized phase III study of panitumumab (pmab) with FOLFOX4 for first-line metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) J. Clin. Oncol 2010 29 suppl 3510 24718886
  11. [12]Davies H Bignell GR Cox C Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer Nature 2002 6 27 417 6892 949 954 12068308
  12. [13]Tie J Gibbs P Lipton L Optimizing targeted therapeutic development: analysis of a colorectal cancer patient population with the BRAF(V600E) mutation Int. J. Cancer 2011 5 1 128 9 2075 2084 20635392
  13. [14]Yokota T Ura T Shibata N BRAF mutation is a powerful prognostic factor in advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer Br. J. Cancer 2011 3 1 104 5 856 862 21285991 PMC3048210
  14. [15]Price TJ Hardingham JE Lee CK Impact of KRAS and BRAF Gene Mutation Status on Outcomes From the Phase III AGITG MAX Trial of Capecitabine Alone or in Combination With Bevacizumab and Mitomycin in Advanced Colorectal Cancer J. Clin. Oncol 2011 7 1 29 19 2675 2682 21646616
  15. [16]Ogino S Shima K Meyerhardt JA Predictive and prognostic roles of BRAF mutation in stage III colon cancer: results from intergroup trial CALGB 89803 Clin. Cancer Res 2012 2 1 18 3 890 900 22147942 PMC3271172
  16. [17]Wan PT Garnett MJ Roe SM Mechanism of activation of the RAF-ERK signaling pathway by oncogenic mutations of B-RAF Cell 2004 3 19 116 6 855 867 15035987
  17. [18]Pritchard C Carragher L Aldridge V Mouse models for BRAF-induced cancers Biochem. Soc. Trans 2007 11 35 Pt 5 1329 1333 17956344 PMC2637606
  18. [22]Enge S Byrd D Comptom C Fritz A Green F Trotti A Cancer Staging Manual 2010 7th ed. Nwe York, NY Springer
  19. [23]Tran B Kopetz S Tie J Impact of BRAF mutation and microsatellite instability on the pattern of metastatic spread and prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer Cancer 2011 10 15 117 20 4623 4632 21456008 PMC4257471
  20. [24]Samowitz WS Sweeney C Herrick J Poor survival associated with the BRAF V600E mutation in microsatellite-stable colon cancers Cancer Res 2005 7 15 65 14 6063 6069 16024606
  21. [25]Tol J Nagtegaal ID Punt CJ BRAF mutation in metastatic colorectal cancer N. Engl. J. Med 2009 7 2 361 1 98 99 19571295
  22. [26]Souglakos J Philips J Wang R Prognostic and predictive value of common mutations for treatment response and survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer Br. J. Cancer 2009 8 4 101 3 465 472 19603024 PMC2720232
  23. [27]Maughan TS Adams RA Smith CG Addition of cetuximab to oxaliplatin-based first-line combination chemotherapy for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: results of the randomised phase 3 MRC COIN trial Lancet 2011 6 18 377 9783 2103 2114 21641636 PMC3159415
  24. [29]Masi G Loupakis F Salvatore L Bevacizumab with FOLFOXIRI (irinotecan, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and folinate) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase 2 trial Lancet Oncol 2010 9 11 9 845 852 20702138
  25. [30]Richman SD Seymour MT Chambers P KRAS and BRAF Mutations in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Are Associated With Poor Prognosis but Do Not Preclude Benefit From Oxaliplatin or Irinotecan: Results From the MRC FOCUS Trial J. Clin. Oncol 2009 12 10 27 35 5931 5937 19884549
  26. [31]Hutchins G Southward K Handley K Value of mismatch repair, KRAS, and BRAF mutations in predicting recurrence and benefits from chemotherapy in colorectal cancer J. Clin. Oncol 2011 4 1 29 10 1261 1270 21383284
  27. [32]De Roock W Claes B Bernasconi D Effects of< i>KRAS, BRAF, NRAS</i>and< i>PIK3CA</i>mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective consortium analysis The lancet oncology 2010 11 8 753 762 20619739
  28. [33]Smalley KS Xiao M Villanueva J CRAF inhibition induces apoptosis in melanoma cells with non-V600E BRAF mutations Oncogene 2009 1 8 28 1 85 94 18794803 PMC2898184
  29. [34]Gavin PG Colangelo LH Fumagalli D Mutation Profiling and Microsatellite Instability in Stage II and III Colon Cancer: An Assessment of Their Prognostic and Oxaliplatin Predictive Value Clin. Cancer Res 2012 12 1 18 23 6531 6541 23045248 PMC4273673
  30. [35]Phipps AI Buchanan DD Makar KW BRAF mutation status and survival after colorectal cancer diagnosis according to patient and tumor characteristics Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev 2012 10 21 10 1792 1798 22899730 PMC3467328

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morris, V., Overman, M. J., Jiang, Z.-Q., Garrett, C., Agarwal, S., Eng, C., Kee, B., Fogelman, D., Dasari, A., Wolff, R., Maru, D., & Kopetz, S.
Affiliations
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Kopetz, Scott
Venue
Clinical Colorectal Cancer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
164-171
ISSN
1533-0028 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975946874
Cited by
132
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Colorectal Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Health (CA16672)
  • Cancer Center Support
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Keywords
BRAF mutation, metastatic colorectal cancer, progression-free survival, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, prognostic factors, overall survival, ascertainment bias
MeSH terms
Cetuximab, Irinotecan, Oxaliplatin, Panitumumab, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Camptothecin, Female, Humans, Liver Neoplasms, Lung Neoplasms, Lymphatic Metastasis, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Neoplasm Staging, Organoplatinum Compounds, Peritoneal Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Tumor, Colorectal Neoplasms, Survival Rate, Disease-Free Survival, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf, Microsatellite Instability, Metastasectomy, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review