Cited by 592Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesMelanoma and MAPK PathwaysColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments

Combined BRAF, EGFR, and MEK Inhibition in Patients with BRAF V600E-Mutant Colorectal Cancer

Open access
Corcoran, Ryan B., André, Thierry, Atreya, Chloe E., Schellens, Jan H.M., Yoshino, Takayuki, Bendell, Johanna C., Hollebecque, Antoine, McRee, Autumn J. +16 more·2018·Cancer Discovery

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Although BRAF inhibitor monotherapy yields response rates >50% in BRAFV600-mutant melanoma, only approximately 5% of patients with BRAFV600E colorectal cancer respond. Preclinical studies suggest that the lack of efficacy in BRAFV600E colorectal cancer is due to adaptive feedback reactivation of MAPK signaling, often mediated by EGFR. This clinical trial evaluated BRAF and EGFR inhibition with dabrafenib (D) + panitumumab (P) ± MEK inhibition with trametinib (T) to achieve greater MAPK suppression and improved efficacy in 142 patients with BRAFV600E colorectal cancer. Confirmed response rates for D+P, D+T+P, and T+P were 10%, 21%, and 0%, respectively. Pharmacodynamic analysis of paired pretreatment and on-treatment biopsies found that efficacy of D+T+P correlated with increased MAPK suppression. Serial cell-free DNA analysis revealed additional correlates of response and emergence of KRAS and NRAS mutations on disease progression. Thus, targeting adaptive feedback pathways in BRAFV600E colorectal cancer can improve efficacy, but MAPK reactivation remains an important primary and acquired resistance mechanism. Significance: This trial demonstrates that combined BRAF + EGFR + MEK inhibition is tolerable, with promising activity in patients with BRAFV600E colorectal cancer. Our findings highlight the MAPK pathway as a critical target in BRAFV600E colorectal cancer and the need to optimize strategies inhibiting this pathway to overcome both primary and acquired resistance. Cancer Discov; 8(4); 428–43. ©2018 AACR. See related commentary by Janku, p. 389. See related article by Hazar-Rethinam et al., p. 417. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 371

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-17-1226

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combination therapies to suppress adaptive feedback proved key to optimizing the frequency and durability of response in each tumor type.

    “Still, in all cases, combination therapies to suppress adaptive feedback proved key to optimizing the frequency and durability of response in each tumor type (34,50,51).”

    From Vertical Pathway Inhibition Overcomes Adaptive Feedback Resistance to KRASG12C Inhibition (2020) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Abstract and Discussion report that targeting adaptive feedback improved response rates in BRAF V600E–mutant colorectal cancer. But the Discussion says response duration remained poor and further optimization was needed. This study therefore does not establish that the combination optimized durability, or outcomes in every tumor type. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • RAS/RAF-mutated CRC targeted therapies have been largely ineffective, likely due to complex resistance mechanisms such as intrinsic and adaptive resistance.

    “Although RAS/RAF-mutated CRC has been targeted for the development of therapeutic inhibitors, they have been largely ineffective, likely due to complex resistance mechanisms such as intrinsic and adaptive resistance [5–12].”

    From An integrative gene expression signature analysis identifies CMS4 KRAS-mutated colorectal cancers sensitive to combined MEK and SRC targeted therapy (2022) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Introduction reports that single-agent BRAF inhibitors had little efficacy in BRAF V600E-mutant CRC and describes adaptive MAPK reactivation as a proposed explanation. The Discussion identifies MAPK reactivation as a mechanism of primary and acquired resistance. The paper does not establish that targeted therapies have been largely ineffective across RAS/RAF-mutated CRC generally; its clinical study concerns BRAF V600E-mutant CRC. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Combined BRAF and EGFR inhibition significantly improves response rates in BRAF V600E metastatic CRC patients (10% or 19%) and has become FDA-approved standard of care.

    “Recent clinical trials report that combined BRAF and EGFR inhibition significantly improves response rates in BRAF (V600E) metastatic CRC patients (10% or 19%) [10, 13], and has now become the FDA-approved, standard of care.”

    From An integrative gene expression signature analysis identifies CMS4 KRAS-mutated colorectal cancers sensitive to combined MEK and SRC targeted therapy (2022) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Results (Efficacy; page not provided) report a 10% confirmed response rate with combined BRAF and EGFR inhibition in patients with BRAF V600E colorectal cancer. They report 19 responders—not a 19% response rate—in the arm that also received MEK inhibition. The paper does not establish a statistically significant improvement or say this CRC treatment was FDA-approved standard of care; its Introduction discusses FDA approval for other cancers. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Adaptive resistance can rapidly induce drug resistance to targeted therapy in tumors that are natively sensitive.

    “Thus, AR can rapidly induce drug resistance to targeted therapy in tumors that are natively “sensitive”.”

    From An integrative gene expression signature analysis identifies CMS4 KRAS-mutated colorectal cancers sensitive to combined MEK and SRC targeted therapy (2022) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Introduction describes adaptive feedback that restores MAPK signaling after initial suppression by a BRAF inhibitor, and the Discussion links MAPK reactivation to resistance in BRAF V600E colorectal cancer (page numbers unavailable). The claim extends this finding to natively sensitive tumors generally, whereas the paper emphasizes that these colorectal tumors respond poorly to BRAF inhibitor monotherapy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Combined EGFR and BRAF blockade proved synthetic lethality in preclinical models of BRAFV600E CRC and modestly improves survival of patients with advanced disease.

    “Combined EGFR and BRAF blockade proved synthetic lethality in preclinical models of BRAFV600E CRC and modestly improves survival of patients with advanced disease [7, 8, 15–17].”

    From Co-targeting SRC overcomes resistance to BRAF inhibitors in colorectal cancer (2025) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Introduction reports improved MAPK suppression and tumor regression with combined BRAF and EGFR inhibition in preclinical BRAFV600E CRC xenografts, but does not establish synthetic lethality. The Discussion describes modest clinical activity, and the Results > Efficacy reports survival times; without a survival comparator, this paper does not establish that the combination improves patient survival. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corcoran, R. B., André, T., Atreya, C. E., Schellens, J. H. M., Yoshino, T., Bendell, J. C., Hollebecque, A., McRee, A. J., Siena, S., Middleton, G., Muro, K., Gordon, M. S., Tabernero, J., Yaeger, R., O'Dwyer, P. J., Humblet, Y., De Vos, F., Jung, A. S., Brase, J. C., Jaeger, S., Bettinger, S., Mookerjee, B., Rangwala, F., & Van Cutsem, E.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Sorbonne Université (FR)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
  • 5National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
  • Sarah Cannon (US)
  • Institut Gustave Roussy (FR)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • Aichi Cancer Center (JP)
  • Pinnacle Oncology Hematology (US)
  • Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • 16St-Luc University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
  • 17Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Amgen (United States) (US)
  • Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
  • 21Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey.
  • 22University Hospitals Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Corresponding author
Corcoran, Ryan B.
Venue
Cancer Discovery
Published
2018-04-01
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
428-443
ISSN
  • 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-8290
OpenAlex
W2791410762
Cited by
592
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 107 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 29
FWCI
28.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation (Damon Runyon) (Clinical Investigator Award)
  • HHS | NIH | National Cancer Institute (NCI) (P50CA127003, R01CA208437)
  • American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) (SU2C-AACR-DT22-17)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Keywords
BRAF V600E mutation, colorectal cancer, dabrafenib, panitumumab, trametinib, MEK inhibition, EGFR inhibition, BRAF inhibition, MAPK signaling, acquired drug resistance, KRAS mutation, NRAS mutation, cell-free DNA, pharmacodynamic biomarkers, combination therapy
MeSH terms
Panitumumab, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Female, Humans, Imidazoles, Male, Oximes, Pyridones, Pyrimidinones, Colorectal Neoplasms, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases, MAP Kinase Signaling System, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review