An emerging role for eotaxins in neurodegenerative disease
Abstract
Eotaxins are C-C motif chemokines first identified as potent eosinophil chemoattractants. They facilitate eosinophil recruitment to sites of inflammation in response to parasitic infections as well as allergic and autoimmune diseases such as asthma, atopic dermatitis, and inflammatory bowel disease. The eotaxin family currently includes three members: eotaxin-1 (CCL11), eotaxin-2 (CCL24), and eotaxin-3 (CCL26). Despite having only ~30% sequence homology to one another, each was identified based on its ability to bind the chemokine receptor, CCR3. Beyond their role in innate immunity, recent studies have shown that CCL11 and related molecules may directly contribute to degenerative processes in the central nervous system (CNS). CCL11 levels increase in the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid of both mice and humans as part of normal aging. In mice, these increases are associated with declining neurogenesis and impaired cognition and memory. In humans, elevated plasma levels of CCL11 have been observed in Alzheimer's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Huntington's disease, and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis when compared to age-matched, healthy controls. Since CCL11 is capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier of normal mice, it is plausible that eotaxins generated in the periphery may exert physiological and pathological actions in the CNS. Here, we briefly review known functions of eotaxin family members during innate immunity, and then focus on whether and how th…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CCL11 efficiently crosses the blood brain barrier, has been implicated in neuroinflammatory disorders and SARS-CoV-2 cognitive impairment, and impairs neurogenesis.
“CCL11 efficiently crosses the blood brain barrier56, has been implicated in neuroinflammatory disorders and SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) cognitive impairment57,58, and impairs neurogenesis54,58,59.”
From Senescent-like microglia limit remyelination through the senescence associated secretory phenotype (2025) · cites this paper as [57]
Cites
Functional differences between microglia and monocytes after ischemic stroke
Ritzel, R. M., Patel, A. R., Grenier, J. M., Crapser, J., Verma, R., Jellison, E. R., & McCullough, L. D. (2015) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-015-0329-1 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Westin, K., Buchhave, P., Nielsen, H., Minthon, L., Janciauskiene, S., & Hansson, O. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030525 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Inflammatory Proteins in Plasma Are Associated with Severity of Alzheimer’s Disease
Leung, R., Proitsi, P., Simmons, A., Lunnon, K., Güntert, A., Kronenberg, D., Pritchard, M., Tsolaki, M., Mecocci, P., Kloszewska, I., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064971 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Plasma Biomarkers Discriminate Clinical Forms of Multiple Sclerosis
Tejera-Alhambra, M., Casrouge, A., de Andrés, C., Seyfferth, A., Ramos-Medina, R., Alonso, B., Vega, J., Fernández-Paredes, L., Albert, M. L., & Sánchez-Ramón, S. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128952 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Graves, J. S., Krysko, K. M., Hua, L. H., Absinta, M., Franklin, R. J. M., & Segal, B. M. (2023) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(22)00184-3 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Self-citationNeuroinflammation in Huntington’s disease: From animal models to clinical therapeutics
Jia, Q., Li, S., Li, X.-J., & Yin, P. (2022) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.1088124 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Senescent-like microglia limit remyelination through the senescence associated secretory phenotype
Gross, P. S., Durán-Laforet, V., Ho, L. T., Melchor, G. S., Zia, S., Manavi, Z., Barclay, W. E., Lee, S. H., Shults, N., Selva, S., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-57632-w · Cited by 62 · see citing works
- Authors
- Huber, A. K., Giles, D. A., Segal, B. M., & Irani, D. N.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Irani, David N.
- Venue
- Clinical Immunology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 189
- Pages
- 29-33
- ISSN
- 1521-6616 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2520455729
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 4.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Immunology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Chemokine receptors and signaling
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Keywords
- eotaxin, CCL24, CCL26, CCR3, neurodegenerative diseases, Alzheimer's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Huntington's disease, multiple sclerosis, neurogenesis, aging, blood-brain barrier, innate immunity, eosinophil recruitment, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers
- MeSH terms
- Chemokine CCL26, Aging, Animals, Humans, Immunity, Innate, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Receptors, CCR3, Chemokine CCL11, Chemokine CCL24
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review