Cited by 133Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsChemokine receptors and signalingAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

An emerging role for eotaxins in neurodegenerative disease

Huber, Amanda K., Giles, David A., Segal, Benjamin M., Irani, David N.·2018·Clinical Immunology

Abstract

Eotaxins are C-C motif chemokines first identified as potent eosinophil chemoattractants. They facilitate eosinophil recruitment to sites of inflammation in response to parasitic infections as well as allergic and autoimmune diseases such as asthma, atopic dermatitis, and inflammatory bowel disease. The eotaxin family currently includes three members: eotaxin-1 (CCL11), eotaxin-2 (CCL24), and eotaxin-3 (CCL26). Despite having only ~30% sequence homology to one another, each was identified based on its ability to bind the chemokine receptor, CCR3. Beyond their role in innate immunity, recent studies have shown that CCL11 and related molecules may directly contribute to degenerative processes in the central nervous system (CNS). CCL11 levels increase in the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid of both mice and humans as part of normal aging. In mice, these increases are associated with declining neurogenesis and impaired cognition and memory. In humans, elevated plasma levels of CCL11 have been observed in Alzheimer's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Huntington's disease, and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis when compared to age-matched, healthy controls. Since CCL11 is capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier of normal mice, it is plausible that eotaxins generated in the periphery may exert physiological and pathological actions in the CNS. Here, we briefly review known functions of eotaxin family members during innate immunity, and then focus on whether and how th…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clim.2016.09.010

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CCL11 efficiently crosses the blood brain barrier, has been implicated in neuroinflammatory disorders and SARS-CoV-2 cognitive impairment, and impairs neurogenesis.

    “CCL11 efficiently crosses the blood brain barrier56, has been implicated in neuroinflammatory disorders and SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) cognitive impairment57,58, and impairs neurogenesis54,58,59.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huber, A. K., Giles, D. A., Segal, B. M., & Irani, D. N.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Irani, David N.
Venue
Clinical Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-04
Volume
189
Pages
29-33
ISSN
1521-6616 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2520455729
Cited by
133
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Chemokine receptors and signaling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
eotaxin, CCL24, CCL26, CCR3, neurodegenerative diseases, Alzheimer's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Huntington's disease, multiple sclerosis, neurogenesis, aging, blood-brain barrier, innate immunity, eosinophil recruitment, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers
MeSH terms
Chemokine CCL26, Aging, Animals, Humans, Immunity, Innate, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Receptors, CCR3, Chemokine CCL11, Chemokine CCL24

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review