Cited by 36Adrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsAdrenal Hormones and DisordersHormonal Regulation and Hypertension

The urinary steroid profile in patients diagnosed with adrenal incidentaloma

Kotłowska, Alicja, Maliński, Edmund, Sworczak, Krzysztof, Kumirska, Jolanta, Stepnowski, Piotr·2009·Clinical Biochemistry

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the possible urinary markers of hormonal activity in patients with non-functioning adrenal incidentalomas. In order to evaluate the endocrine activity of aforementioned tumours, urinary steroid metabolite levels were analyzed in samples from patients and controls. Possible blocks in metabolic pathways of the examined hormones were determined by comparing selected urinary steroid metabolite sums and ratios in both groups of interest.Design Urine samples were collected from 20 patients with non-functioning adrenal incidentalomas and from 25 controls matched in terms of age, sex and BMI. Excretion of 19 major urinary steroid metabolites was analyzed by gas chromatography. The results were subjected to statistical analysis.Results In patients with adrenal incidentalomas sum of total urinary cortisol metabolites was significantly increased in respect to the control group. We also observed a shift towards tetrahydrocorticosterone, cortisol and etiocholanolone production in patients. No significant differences in production of other urinary steroid metabolites were noted in patients with adrenal incidentalomas in respect to control group.Conclusions Our data suggests that not only urinary free cortisol but also its metabolite such as tetrahydrocortisol and other steroids including etiocholanolone and corticosterone tetrahydrometabolite might be urinary markers for the endocrine activity of adrenal incidentalomas. Enhanced levels of these urinary steroid metabolites indicate an impairment of 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity and slightly increased activity of 5beta-reductase in patients with adrenal incidentalomas.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2008.12.027

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Twenty-four-hour urine steroid excretion analysis has significant potential in the assessment of adrenal diseases.

    “Twenty-four-hour urine steroid excretion analysis represents a more accurate estimate of total corticosteroid production and of adrenal precursor steroids and metabolites (342, 343) and therefore has significant potential in the assessment of adrenal diseases.”

    From Adrenal incidentaloma (2020) · cites this paper as [343]

  • Twenty-four-hour urine steroid excretion analysis represents a more accurate estimate of total corticosteroid production and of adrenal precursor steroids and metabolites than standard serum measurements.

    “Twenty-four-hour urine steroid excretion analysis represents a more accurate estimate of total corticosteroid production and of adrenal precursor steroids and metabolites (342, 343) and therefore has significant potential in the assessment of adrenal diseases.”

    From Adrenal incidentaloma (2020) · cites this paper as [343]

  • There is a possibility that some patients with "nonsecretory" AIs and distinct urinary steroid patterns could have had an autonomously secreting lesion or a small ACC.

    “There is, therefore, the possibility that some of these patients could have had an autonomously secreting lesion or a small ACC.”

    From Adrenal incidentaloma (2020) · cites this paper as [343]

  • Kotłowska et al. reported that 25% of patients with "nonsecretory" AIs had distinct patterns of urinary steroids compared to controls and other patients with AIs.

    “Interestingly, 25% of patients with “nonsecretory” AIs had distinct patterns of urinary steroids compared to the controls and other patients with AIs.”

    From Adrenal incidentaloma (2020) · cites this paper as [343]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kotłowska, A., Maliński, E., Sworczak, K., Kumirska, J., & Stepnowski, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Gdańsk (PL)
  • Gdańsk Medical University (PL)
Corresponding author
Stepnowski, Piotr
Venue
Clinical Biochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
42
Issue
6
Pages
448-454
ISSN
0009-9120 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052276728
Cited by
36
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Gdański Uniwersytet Medyczny
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Keywords
adrenal incidentaloma, urinary steroid metabolites, urinary cortisol metabolites, tetrahydrocortisol, etiocholanolone, corticosterone, 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, 5beta-reductase, urinary biomarkers
MeSH terms
Adrenal Gland Neoplasms, Adult, Aged, Chromatography, Gas, Corticosterone, Etiocholanolone, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Middle Aged, Oxidoreductases, Pheochromocytoma, Steroids, Tetrahydrocortisol, Biomarkers, Tumor, 11-beta-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review