Cited by 9Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlDiabetes Management and ResearchAdvanced Glycation End Products research

Evaluation of a HbA1c point-of-care analyzer

Menéndez-Valladares, Paloma, Fernández-Riejos, Patricia, Sánchez-Mora, Catalina, Pérez-Pérez, Antonio, Sánchez-Margalet, Victor, González-Rodríguez, Concepción·2015·Clinical Biochemistry

Abstract

Objectives A better glycemic monitoring of diabetic patients and avoiding complications of poorly controlled diabetes could be possible with point-of-care testing technology (POCT) for HbA1c determination. B-Analyst® was studied to check whether it complied with the quality requirements for this purpose. Design and methods We evaluated the B-Analyst® (Menarini Diagnostics), which is based in the principle of latex agglutination immunoturbidimetry, to assess the validity of the technique of HbA1c. We carried out the method comparison with the HA-8180® (Menarini Diagnostics) as a reference method [High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)]. We assessed the analytical quality of the B-Analyst® studying the accuracy: inter-assay variability and intra-assay study. Furthermore, possible interferences by hemoglobinopathies were studied. Results Regression analysis of the data for the method comparison between HA-8180® and B-Analyst® showed a slope of 1.0085 and an intercept of 0.1208. The Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.9958 (p<0.0001). Bias study showed a mean difference from B-Analyst® with respect to HA-8180® of 0.1872 with a 95% confidence interval. The standard error of the estimate (Syx) was 0.2091. The concordance correlation coefficient to assess accuracy was 0.9922 (0.9891-0.9945). The CV for the inter-assay study was 1.4%. For the intra-assay study we analyzed 3 samples with different HbA1c % whose CV were 1.03% [4.7% HbA1c (28 mmol/mol)], 0.46% [6.4% HbA1c (46 mmol/mol)] and 0.78% [8.1% HbA1c (65 mmol/mol)]. Conclusion The B-Analyst® evaluated not only showed good correlation with HA-8180®, but also it presented a great accuracy both in the inter-assay and in the intra-assay studies. The B-Analyst® complies with quality specifications required for monitoring of diabetic patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2015.03.016

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Menéndez-Valladares, P., Fernández-Riejos, P., Sánchez-Mora, C., Pérez-Pérez, A., Sánchez-Margalet, V., & González-Rodríguez, C.
Affiliations
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena (ES)
Corresponding author
Menéndez-Valladares, Paloma
Venue
Clinical Biochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
48
Issue
10-11
Pages
686-689
ISSN
0009-9120 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985278698
Cited by
8
References
23
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Advanced Glycation End Products research
Keywords
HbA1c, point-of-care testing, method comparison, analytical accuracy, inter-assay variability, hemoglobinopathies, assay interference
MeSH terms
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Diabetes Mellitus, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Point-of-Care Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review