Cited by 41Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlScientific Measurement and Uncertainty EvaluationDiabetes Management and Research

Pre-analytical and analytical aspects affecting clinical reliability of plasma glucose results

Pasqualetti, Sara, Braga, Federica, Panteghini, Mauro·2017·Clinical Biochemistry

Abstract

The measurement of plasma glucose (PG) plays a central role in recognizing disturbances in carbohydrate metabolism, with established decision limits that are globally accepted. This requires that PG results are reliable and unequivocally valid no matter where they are obtained. To control the pre-analytical variability of PG and prevent in vitro glycolysis, the use of citrate as rapidly effective glycolysis inhibitor has been proposed. However, the commercial availability of several tubes with studies showing different performance has created confusion among users. Moreover, and more importantly, studies have shown that tubes promptly inhibiting glycolysis give PG results that are significantly higher than tubes containing sodium fluoride only, used in the majority of studies generating the current PG cut-points, with a different clinical classification of subjects. From the analytical point of view, to be equivalent among different measuring systems, PG results should be traceable to a recognized higher-order reference via the implementation of an unbroken metrological hierarchy. In doing this, it is important that manufacturers of measuring systems consider the uncertainty accumulated through the different steps of the selected traceability chain. In particular, PG results should fulfil analytical performance specifications defined to fit the intended clinical application. Since PG has tight homeostatic control, its biological variability may be used to define these limits.…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.03.009

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The development of high-reliability glucose monitoring devices requires new technologies and strategies to make sensors more affordable, non-invasive, and suitable for continuous monitoring.

    “Today, the development of devices for glucose monitoring with high reliability need new technologies and strategies to make those sensors more affordable, non-invasive, and suitable for continuous monitoring of glycemic status 40-42.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pasqualetti, S., Braga, F., & Panteghini, M.
Affiliations
University of Milan (IT)
Corresponding author
Pasqualetti, Sara
Venue
Clinical Biochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
50
Issue
10-11
Pages
587-594
ISSN
0009-9120 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2594861416
Cited by
41
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
plasma glucose, pre-analytical variability, sodium fluoride, measurement uncertainty, analytical performance specifications, biological variation, point-of-care glucose testing, carbohydrate metabolism
MeSH terms
Blood Chemical Analysis, Blood Glucose, Blood Specimen Collection, Glycolysis, Humans, Citric Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review