Cited by 74Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology

The relationship between balance performance, lumbar extension strength, trunk extension endurance, and pain in participants with chronic low back pain, and those without

Behennah, Jessica, Conway, Rebecca, Fisher, James, Osborne, Neil, Steele, James·2018·Clinical Biomechanics

Abstract

Background Chronic low back pain is associated with lumbar extensor deconditioning. This may contribute to decreased neuromuscular control and balance. However, balance is also influenced by the hip musculature. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine balance in both asymptomatic participants and those with chronic low back pain, and to examine the relationships among balance, lumbar extension strength, trunk extension endurance, and pain. Methods Forty three asymptomatic participants and 21 participants with non-specific chronic low back pain underwent balance testing using the Star Excursion Balance Test, lumbar extension strength, trunk extension endurance, and pain using a visual analogue scale. Findings Significant correlations were found between lumbar extension strength and Star Excursion Balance Test scores in the chronic low back pain group (r = 0.439-0.615) and in the asymptomatic group (r = 0.309-0.411). Correlations in the chronic low back pain group were consistently found in posterior directions. Lumbar extension strength explained ~19.3% to ~37.8% of the variance in Star Excursion Balance Test scores for the chronic low back pain group and ~9.5% to ~16.9% for the asymptomatic group. Interpretation These results suggest that the lumbar extensors may be an important factor in determining the motor control dysfunctions, such as limited balance, that arise in chronic low back pain. As such, specific strengthening of this musculature may be an approach to aid…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.01.023

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Behennah, J., Conway, R., Fisher, J., Osborne, N., & Steele, J.
Affiliations
  • Southampton Solent University (GB)
  • Health Sciences University (GB)
Corresponding author
Steele, James
Venue
Clinical Biomechanics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
53
Pages
22-30
ISSN
0268-0033 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2793573842
Cited by
74
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7
FWCI
3.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Biomechanics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Solent University Research Portal (Solent University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Keywords
chronic low back pain, balance, lumbar extension strength, Star Excursion Balance Test, pain, non-specific low back pain
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Postural Balance, Female, Humans, Lumbosacral Region, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Low Back Pain, Young Adult, Chronic Pain, Torso

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review