The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A novel P300-based brain–computer interface stimulus presentation paradigm: Moving beyond rows and columns
Open accessAbstract
Objective An electroencephalographic brain-computer interface (BCI) can provide a non-muscular means of communication for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) or other neuromuscular disorders. We present a novel P300-based BCI stimulus presentation - the checkerboard paradigm (CBP). CBP performance is compared to that of the standard row/column paradigm (RCP) introduced by Farwell and Donchin (1988).Methods Using an 8x9 matrix of alphanumeric characters and keyboard commands, 18 participants used the CBP and RCP in counter-balanced fashion. With approximately 9-12 min of calibration data, we used a stepwise linear discriminant analysis for online classification of subsequent data.Results Mean online accuracy was significantly higher for the CBP, 92%, than for the RCP, 77%. Correcting for extra selections due to errors, mean bit rate was also significantly higher for the CBP, 23 bits/min, than for the RCP, 17 bits/min. Moreover, the two paradigms produced significantly different waveforms. Initial tests with three advanced ALS participants produced similar results. Furthermore, these individuals preferred the CBP to the RCP.Conclusions These results suggest that the CBP is markedly superior to the RCP in performance and user acceptability.Significance The CBP has the potential to provide a substantially more effective BCI than the RCP. This is especially important for people with severe neuromuscular disabilities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“EEG spellers based on oddball potentials or motor imagery typically achieve 1–5 characters per minute28–32.”
From High-performance brain-to-text communication via handwriting (2021) · cites this paper as [30]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Draper, N. R., & Smith, H. (2005) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2005.s303 · Cited by 17,993
Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control
Wolpaw, J. R., Birbaumer, N., McFarland, D. J., Pfurtscheller, G., & Vaughan, T. M. (2002) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00057-3 · Cited by 7,927
Self-citationUpdating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b
Polich, J. (2007) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019 · Cited by 7,919
Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia
Hochberg, L. R., Serruya, M. D., Friehs, G. M., Mukand, J. A., Saleh, M., Caplan, A. H., Branner, A., Chen, D., Penn, R. D., & Donoghue, J. P. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04970 · Cited by 3,295
Farwell, L. A., & Donchin, E. (1988) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(88)90149-6 · Cited by 3,228
BCI2000: A General-Purpose Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) System
Schalk, G., McFarland, D. J., Hinterberger, T., Birbaumer, N., & Wolpaw, J. R. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2004.827072 · Cited by 3,129
Self-citationApplied Regression Analysis (2nd ed).
de Carvalho, J. F., Draper, N. R., & Smith, H. (1981) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2287608 · Cited by 3,054
Clarke, G. M., Draper, N. R., & Smith, H. (1982) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2982106 · Cited by 1,797
Control of a two-dimensional movement signal by a noninvasive brain-computer interface in humans
Wolpaw, J. R., & McFarland, D. J. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0403504101 · Cited by 1,512
Self-citationOn Quantifying Surprise: The Variation of Event‐Related Potentials With Subjective Probability
Duncan‐Johnson, C. C., & Donchin, E. (1977) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1977.tb01312.x · Cited by 1,235
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Allison BZ. P3 or not P3: toward a better P300 BCI. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego, CA; 2003.
- Sharbrough, 1991, AEEGS guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature, Clin Neurophysiol, 8, 202
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brain Computer Interfaces, a Review
Nicolas-Alonso, L. F., & Gomez-Gil, J. (2012) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s120201211 · Cited by 2,143
High-performance brain-to-text communication via handwriting
Willett, F. R., Avansino, D. T., Hochberg, L. R., Henderson, J. M., & Shenoy, K. V. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03506-2 · Cited by 1,024
A comprehensive review of EEG-based brain–computer interface paradigms
Abiri, R., Borhani, S., Sellers, E. W., Jiang, Y., & Zhao, X. (2018) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aaf12e · Cited by 999
Self-citationBrain-Machine Interfaces: From Basic Science to Neuroprostheses and Neurorehabilitation
Lebedev, M., & Nicolelis, M. A. L. (2017) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00027.2016 · Cited by 695
Pandarinath, C., Nuyujukian, P., Blabe, C. H., Sorice, B. L., Saab, J., Willett, F. R., Hochberg, L. R., Shenoy, K. V., & Henderson, J. M. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.18554 · Cited by 566
“Similarly, information transfer rates are also a meaningful point of comparison, though they are less reflective of practical communication rates than bitrate (which takes into account the need to correct errors; detailed in Nuyujukian et al. (2015) ; Townsend et al. (2010) ).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Townsend, G., LaPallo, B. K., Boulay, C. B., Krusienski, D. J., Frye, G. E., Hauser, C. K., Schwartz, N. E., Vaughan, T. M., Wolpaw, J. R., & Sellers, E. W.
- Affiliations
- Algoma University (CA)
- New York State Department of Health (US)
- University of North Florida (US)
- East Tennessee State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sellers, E.W.
- Venue
- Clinical Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1109-1120
- ISSN
- 1388-2457 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2879474
- OpenAlex
- W2158655338
- Cited by
- 570
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 47
- FWCI
- 29.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Digital Commons - East Tennessee State University (East Tennessee State University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (EB 00856, R01EB000856)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD030146, HD30146)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- P300, brain-computer interface, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, neuromuscular disorders, communication aids, data rate, linear discriminant analysis, user acceptance
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Male, Nervous System Diseases, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, User-Computer Interface, Event-Related Potentials, P300
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
