Cited by 1Peripheral Nerve DisordersMuscle Physiology and DisordersMuscle activation and electromyography studies

Contraction response to muscle percussion: A reappraisal of the mechanism of this bedside test

Open access
Czarnetzki, Christoph, Truffert, André, Mekideche, Abdelhafid, Poncet, Antoine, Lysakowski, Christopher, Tramèr, Martin R., Magistris, Michel R.·2018·Clinical Neurophysiology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study whether the contraction evoked by muscle percussion stems from the excitation of the muscle or of the nerve and to discuss the changes of this response in neuromuscular disorders. METHODS: In 30 neurologically healthy patients undergoing surgery (for ear, nose, or throat problems unrelated to the study) under general anesthesia with propofol and sufentanil we measured with an electrogoniometer the maximal dorsiflexion of the ankle evoked by reflex hammer percussion of the tibialis anterior muscle before and under neuromuscular junction blockade with rocuronium bromide. In 3 additional healthy volunteers we searched for F-waves to disclose whether percussion excites axons within the muscle. RESULTS: Responses from 28 neurologically healthy patients (15 women) were analyzed after exclusion of 2 due to technical problems. Mean age (SD) was 28 (9) years. Maximal dorsiflexion of the ankle was not significantly modified by neuromuscular junction blockade (mean difference 0.01 mV [95%CI, -0.07 to 0.08], p=0.879). Muscle percussion evoked F-waves in the 3 healthy volunteers tested. CONCLUSIONS: Maximal contraction response to muscle percussion has a muscular rather than a neural origin. However, percussion also excites axons within the muscle. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings may provide clues to understand the changes observed in neuromuscular disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.10.013

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Babinski J, Jarkowski J. Sur l'excitabilité idio-musculaire et sur les réflexes tendineux dans la myopathie progressive primitive. Rev Neurol (Paris) 1911;1:778-80.
  2. Coërs C. Les variations structurelles normales et pathologiques de la jonction neuromusculaire. Acta Neurol Psychiatr Belg 1955;55:741-866.
  3. Guillain G, Barré JA, Strohl A. Sur un syndrome de radiculonévrite avec hyperalbuminose du liquide céphalo-rachidien sans réaction cellulaire. Remarques sur les caractères cliniques et graphiques des réflexes tendineux. Bull Soc Med Hop Paris 1916;40:1462-70.
  4. Ropper AH, Wijdicks EFM, Truax BT. Guillain-Barré syndrome. Philadelphia: FA Davis Company, Oxford University Press; 1991. p. 73-105.
  5. Schiller A. Percussion musculaire: réponses normales et pathologiques. Medical thesis No. 9974. Geneva University -Medical Faculty; 1997.
  6. So YT, Zu L, Barraza C, Figueroa KP, Pulst SM. Rippling muscle disease: evidence for phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity. Muscle Nerve 2001;24:340-4.
  7. Strohl A. Contribution à l'étude physiologique des réflexes chez l'homme. Les réflexes d'automatisme médullaire: le phénomène des raccourcisseurs. Medical Thesis. G Steinheil éditeur, Paris; 1913.

Cited by

Authors
Czarnetzki, C., Truffert, A., Mekideche, A., Poncet, A., Lysakowski, C., Tramèr, M. R., & Magistris, M. R.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Magistris, Michel R.
Venue
Clinical Neurophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
129
Issue
1
Pages
51-58
ISSN
1388-2457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2767040737
Cited by
1
References
18
Citations by year
2020: 1
FWCI
0.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Division of Anesthesiology and the Division of Neurology, Geneva University Hospitals
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Peripheral Nerve Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Keywords
ankle dorsiflexion, tibialis anterior, neuromuscular blockade, rocuronium, F-wave, neuromuscular disorders, muscle contraction, nerve excitation
MeSH terms
Point-of-Care Testing, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Muscle Contraction, Myography, Neuromuscular Junction, Percussion, Muscle, Skeletal, Evoked Potentials, Motor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review