Cited by 36Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchLanguage Development and DisordersNeuroscience and Music Perception

Atypical perceptual and neural processing of emotional prosodic changes in children with autism spectrum disorders

Open access
Lindström, R., Lepistö-Paisley, T., Makkonen, T., Reinvall, O., Nieminen-von Wendt, T., Alén, R., Kujala, T.·2018·Clinical Neurophysiology

Abstract

Objective The present study explored the processing of emotional speech prosody in school-aged children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) but without marked language impairments (children with ASD [no LI]). Methods The mismatch negativity (MMN)/the late discriminative negativity (LDN), reflecting pre-attentive auditory discrimination processes, and the P3a, indexing involuntary orienting to attention-catching changes, were recorded to natural word stimuli uttered with different emotional connotations (neutral, sad, scornful and commanding). Perceptual prosody discrimination was addressed with a behavioral sound-discrimination test. Results Overall, children with ASD (no LI) were slower in behaviorally discriminating prosodic features of speech stimuli than typically developed control children. Further, smaller standard-stimulus event related potentials (ERPs) and MMN/LDNs were found in children with ASD (no LI) than in controls. In addition, the amplitude of the P3a was diminished and differentially distributed on the scalp in children with ASD (no LI) than in control children. Conclusions Processing of words and changes in emotional speech prosody is impaired at various levels of information processing in school-aged children with ASD (no LI). Significance The results suggest that low-level speech sound discrimination and orienting deficits might contribute to emotional speech prosody processing impairments observed in ASD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.08.018

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Lindström, R., Lepistö-Paisley, T., Makkonen, T., Reinvall, O., Nieminen-von Wendt, T., Alén, R., & Kujala, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Central Finland Health Care District (FI)
Corresponding author
Lindström, R.
Venue
Clinical Neurophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
129
Issue
11
Pages
2411-2420
ISSN
1388-2457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2890320103
Cited by
36
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Finnish Cultural Foundation, The Academy of Finland (276414)
  • Finnish Brain Foundation, the Alfred Kordelin Foundation and the Emil Aaltonen Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, prosodic processing, mismatch negativity, P3a, event-related potentials, auditory discrimination, speech sound discrimination
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Child, Discrimination, Psychological, Emotions, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Linguistics, Male, Speech Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review