Meta-analysis of the efficacy of a single dose of phenylephrine 10 mg compared with placebo in adults with acute nasal congestion due to the common cold
Abstract
Background Although nonprescription oral phenylephrine 10 mg has been judged "generally recognized as safe and effective" by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), its efficacy as a nasal decongestant has been questioned. Objective This study assessed available data on the efficacy of oral phenylephrine 10 mg as a nasal decongestant. Methods Three sources were used to identify potentially relevant publications--the bibliography of the phenylephrine section of the 1976 FDA monograph on over-the-counter cold, cough, allergy, bronchodilator, and antiasthmatic products; a 2004 Cochrane Review of nasal decongestants for the common cold; and a search of MEDLINE from 1966 through January 2007 using the term phenylephrine nasal. To be included in the analyses, studies had to have a single-dose, randomized, placebo-controlled design; involve an orally administered product in which phenylephrine 10 mg was the sole active ingredient; enroll patients with acute nasal congestion due to the common cold; evaluate nasal airway resistance (NAR) as the efficacy end point; and have sufficient data in the study report to allow reanalysis and/or meta-analysis of phenylephrine 10 mg versus placebo. Reanalysis of individual studies and fixed-effects and random-effects meta-analyses were performed. Statistical significance at 30 and 60 minutes after dosing (the primary time points) and a >or=20% reduction in NAR from baseline were considered indicative of a clinically meaningful difference. Resu…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A meta-analysis demonstrated the effect of oral phenylephrine on acute nasal congestion.
“A meta-analysis also demonstrated this effect with oral administration of phenylephrine [126].”
From Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [126]
Cites
1 retracted
Nasal decongestants for the common cold
Taverner, D., & Latte, G. J. (2007) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001953.pub3 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
RetractedMeta‐Analysis Of Controlled Clinical Trials
Whitehead, A. (2002) · doi:10.1002/0470854200 · Cited by 827 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nasal decongestants in monotherapy for the common cold
Deckx, L., De Sutter, A. I., Guo, L., Mir, N. A., & van Driel, M. L. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009612.pub2 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment
SEAIC Rhinoconjunctivitis Committee & SEORL Rhinology, A., Valero, A., Navarro, A., del Cuvillo, A., Alobid, I., Benito, Jr., Colás, C., de los Santos, G., Fernández Liesa, R., García-Lliberós, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.18176/jiaci.0232 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kollar, C., Schneider, H., Waksman, J., & Krusinska, E.
- Affiliations
- GlaxoSmithKline (United States) (US)
- Consumer Healthcare Products Association (US)
- Venue
- Clinical Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1057-1070
- ISSN
- 0149-2918 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032918645
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
- University of Kansas
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Respiratory viral infections research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Herbal Medicine Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
- Keywords
- nasal decongestants, common cold, nasal resistance, over-the-counter cold remedies, single oral dose, placebo comparison, drug efficacy, crossover design, over-the-counter drug regulation
- MeSH terms
- Acute Disease, Administration, Oral, Adult, Common Cold, Humans, Phenylephrine, Nasal Decongestants, Nasal Obstruction, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review