Cited by 827Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

Meta‐Analysis Of Controlled Clinical Trials

Whitehead, Anne·2002·Wiley eBooks

Abstract

Introduction Protocol development Estimating the treatment difference in an individual trial Combining estimates of a treatment difference across trials Meta--analysis using individual patient data Dealing with heterogeneity Presentation and interpretation of results Selection bias Dealing with non--standard datasets Inclusion of trials with different study designs A Bayesian approach to meta--analysis Sequential methods for meta--analysis Appendix Methods of estimation and hypothesis testing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/0470854200

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Standard random-effects meta-analysis methods assume a normal distribution for the random effects.

    “Standard random-effects meta-analysis methods make this assumption (Whitehead, 2002), and we now discuss the extent to which classical and Bayesian approaches with a normal distribution for the random effects allow the important questions to be addressed.”

    From A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis (2009) · cites this paper as Whitehead, 2002

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whitehead, A.
Corresponding author
Whitehead, Anne
Venue
Wiley eBooks
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-07-15
OpenAlex
W24088030
Cited by
827
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 61
FWCI
25.76
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Wiley eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
meta-analysis, individual patient data, treatment effect estimation, heterogeneity, selection bias, Bayesian meta-analysis, sequential methods, hypothesis testing, study design comparison, protocol design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review