Cited by 31Schizophrenia research and treatmentTreatment of Major DepressionPharmaceutical studies and practices

Single- and Multiple-Dose Pharmacokinetic, Safety, and Tolerability Profiles of Olanzapine Long-Acting Injection: An Open-Label, Multicenter, Nonrandomized Study in Patients With Schizophrenia

Mitchell, Malcolm, Kothare, Prajakti, Bergstrom, Richard, Zhao, Fangyi, Jen, Kai Yu, Walker, Daniel, Johnson, Jason, McDonnell, David·2013·Clinical Therapeutics

Abstract

Background This was the first study, to our knowledge, in patients with schizophrenia in which olanzapine long-acting injection (LAI) was used to attempt delivery of depot formulation in multiple therapeutic doses.Objective This study assessed the safety profile, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of olanzapine after single and multiple administrations of olanzapine LAI and evaluated maintenance of symptom control.Methods This was an open-label, multicenter, nonrandomized study of olanzapine LAI in patients with schizophrenia stabilized with oral olanzapine. Key inclusion criteria included well-tolerated and efficacious treatment with daily olanzapine. Patients were required to be receiving a stable oral dose for 4 weeks before study entry with no requirement for as-needed additional antipsychotic medication within 2 weeks before entry. Exclusion criteria included serious unstable illnesses, unresolved seizures, pregnancy or breastfeeding, hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, narrow-angle glaucoma, or serious suicidal risk. Initially, 34 patients received olanzapine LAI as a single injection of 50 to 450 mg, and as the study progressed, 247 patients received consecutive injections of 100 to 405 mg olanzapine LAI administered every 2, 3, or 4 weeks for 3 to 6 months. Spontaneously reported adverse events were recorded at each visit. Analyses of efficacy and safety profile parameters were performed on an intent-to-treat basis. All hypotheses were tested at a 2-sided significance level of P < 0.05.Results Study participants had a mean age of 39 years and were primarily white men. The PK properties suggested prolonged release providing sustained olanzapine plasma concentrations and supporting a dosing interval ≤4 weeks. Olanzapine LAI doses of 150 or 300 mg every 2 weeks and 210 or 405 mg every 4 weeks provide mean steady-state olanzapine concentrations similar to those after oral administration of 5 to 20 mg/d. The mean baseline Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale score of 17.27 decreased by 2.68 points, and the mean baseline Clinical Global Impression-Severity score of 3.39 decreased by 0.23 points, indicating that patients' psychiatric health was maintained or slightly improved. Significant mean weight gain (P < 0.001) and treatment-emergent changes in nonfasting glucose were observed. Incidence of weight gain ≥7% of baseline was observed in 17.8% of patients. The common adverse events were injection site pain, anxiety, sedation, insomnia, somnolence, and headache, and the safety profile for olanzapine LAI was comparable to that of oral olanzapine, except for injection site-related adverse events.Conclusion The safety profile and PK data from this study support continued clinical development of olanzapine LAI in controlled efficacy studies at doses ≤300 mg every 2 weeks or 405 mg every 4 weeks. Clinical trial registry ID: 4535 http://www.lillytrials.com/results/ZyprexaLAI.pdf.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.09.023

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mitchell, M., Kothare, P., Bergstrom, R., Zhao, F., Jen, K. Y., Walker, D., Johnson, J., & McDonnell, D.
Affiliations
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Mitchell, Malcolm
Venue
Clinical Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
35
Issue
12
Pages
1890-1908
ISSN
0149-2918 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984704903
Cited by
31
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eli Lilly and Company
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
schizophrenia, pharmacokinetics, repeated dosing, dosing interval, steady-state plasma concentration, symptom management, safety and tolerability, adverse events, antipsychotic maintenance, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impression Scale, antipsychotic adverse effects, atypical antipsychotics
MeSH terms
Olanzapine, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Benzodiazepines, Delayed-Action Preparations, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Injections, Intramuscular, Male, Middle Aged, Schizophrenia, Antipsychotic Agents, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review