The DOI matches its Crossref record; 142 of the 142 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phage Therapy in the Resistance Era: Where Do We Stand and Where Are We Going?
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: Widespread antibiotic-resistant bacteria are threatening the arsenal of existing antibiotics. Not only are antibiotics less likely to be effective today, but their extensive use continues to drive the emergence of multidrug-resistant pathogens. A new-old antibacterial strategy with bacteriophages (phages) is under development, namely, phage therapy. Phages are targeted bacterial viruses with multiple antibacterial effector functions, which can reduce multidrug-resistant infections within the human body. This review summarizes recent phage therapy clinical trials and patient cases and outlines the fundamentals behind phage treatment strategies under development, mainly through bench-to-bedside approaches. We discuss the challenges that remain in phage therapy and the role of phages when combined with antibiotic therapy. METHODS: This narrative review presents the current knowledge and latest findings regarding phage therapy. Relevant case reports and research articles available through the Scopus and PubMed databases are discussed. FINDINGS: Although recent clinical data suggest the tolerability and, in some cases, efficacy of phage therapy, the clinical functionality still requires careful definition. The lack of well-controlled clinical trial data and complex regulatory frameworks have driven the most recent human data generation on a single-patient compassionate use basis. These cases often include the concomitant use of antibiotics, which makes it difficult to draw conclusions regarding the effectiveness of phages alone. However, human data support using antibiotics as phage potentiators and resistance breakers; thus, phage adjuvants are a promising avenue for near-term clinical development. Current knowledge gaps exist on the appropriate routes of administration, phage selection, frequency of administration, dosage, phage resistance, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the phages. In addition, we highlight that some phage therapies have mild adverse effects in patients. IMPLICATIONS: Although more translational research is needed before the clinical implementation is feasible, phage therapy may well be pivotal in safeguarding humans against antibiotic-resistant infections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance
Blair, J. M. A., Webber, M. A., Baylay, A. J., Ogbolu, D. O., & Piddock, L. J. V. (2015) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3380 · Cited by 4,092
Mutations of bacteria from virus sensitivity to virus resistance
Luria, S. E., & Delbrück, M. (1943) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/28.6.491 · Cited by 3,894
Marine viruses — major players in the global ecosystem
Suttle, C. A. (2007) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1750 · Cited by 3,157
Bacteriophage resistance mechanisms
Labrie, S. J., Samson, J. E., & Moineau, S. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2315 · Cited by 2,397
Antibacterial drug discovery in the resistance era
Brown, E. D., & Wright, G. D. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17042 · Cited by 2,247
A brief history of the antibiotic era: lessons learned and challenges for the future
Aminov, R. I. (2010) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2010.00134 · Cited by 1,628
Dedrick, R. M., Guerrero-Bustamante, C. A., Garlena, R. A., Russell, D. A., Ford, K., Harris, K., Gilmour, K. C., Soothill, J., Jacobs-Sera, D., Schooley, R. T., et al. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0437-z · Cited by 1,410
Schooley, R. T., Biswas, B., Gill, J. J., Hernandez-Morales, A., Lancaster, J., Lessor, L., Barr, J. J., Reed, S. L., Rohwer, F., Benler, S., et al. (2017) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00954-17 · Cited by 1,254
Pros and cons of phage therapy
Loc-Carrillo, C., & Abedon, S. T. (2011) · Bacteriophage · doi:10.4161/bact.1.2.14590 · Cited by 1,020
Phage diversity, genomics and phylogeny
Dion, M. B., Oechslin, F., & Moineau, S. (2020) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-019-0311-5 · Cited by 960
Cited by
Menz, B. D., Charani, E., Gordon, D. L., Leather, A. J., Moonesinghe, S. R., & Phillips, C. J. (2021) · Infection and Drug Resistance · doi:10.2147/idr.s319780 · Cited by 118
Immunogenicity of bacteriophages
Champagne-Jorgensen, K., Luong, T., Darby, T., & Roach, D. R. (2023) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2023.04.008 · Cited by 115
Self-citationBacteriophage Therapy: Discovery, Development, and FDA Approval Pathways
Niazi, S. K. (2025) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph18081115 · Cited by 56
New technologies for developing phage-based tools to manipulate the human microbiome
Khan Mirzaei, M., & Deng, L. (2022) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2021.04.007 · Cited by 53
Mutalik, V. K., & Arkin, A. P. (2022) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.104121 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Luong, T., Salabarria, A.-C., & Roach, D. R.
- Venue
- Clinical Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-09
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1659-1680
- ISSN
- 0149-2918 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3082973737
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 142
- FWCI
- 14.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phage Therapy in the Resistance Era: Where Do We Stand and Where Are We Going? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.07.014
- The paper
- Luong, T., Salabarria, A.-C., & Roach, D. R. (2020). Phage Therapy in the Resistance Era: Where Do We Stand and Where Are We Going? Clinical Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.07.014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.