Cited by 44Multiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsChemotherapy-related skin toxicityDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions

Risk of Rash Associated With Lenalidomide in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-analysis

Nardone, Beatrice, Wu, Shenhong, Garden, Benjamin C., West, Dennis P., Reich, Lilian M., Lacouture, Mario E.·2013·Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia

Abstract

Background Lenalidomide is indicated for treatment of multiple myeloma in combination with dexamethasone and as a single agent in myelodysplastic syndromes. The incidence and risk of rash has been inconsistently reported.Materials and methods We conducted a systematic review and metaanalysis of the literature to determine the incidence and risk of developing rash. Relevant studies were identified from PubMed and abstracts presented at American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meetings. Incidence, relative risk, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.Results Ten trials were available for analysis, and the overall incidence of all-grade and high-grade rash was 27.2% and 3.6%, respectively. Lenalidomide was associated with increased risk of all-grade rash (P < .001).Conclusion Further studies for prevention and treatment of this toxicity are needed to minimize effect on quality of life and dose intensity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clml.2013.03.006

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most patients can be rechallenged with lenalidomide without recurrence of rash; in rare cases in which rashes recur, management with desensitization strategies involving gradual titration from low starting doses has been effective.

    “Most patients can be rechallenged with lenalidomide without recurrence of rash; in rare cases in which rashes recur, management with desensitization strategies involving gradual titration from low starting doses has been effective136.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nardone, B., Wu, S., Garden, B. C., West, D. P., Reich, L. M., & Lacouture, M. E.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Stony Brook School (US)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Lacouture, Mario E.
Venue
Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-08
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
424-429
ISSN
2152-2650 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136993970
Cited by
44
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Chemotherapy-related skin toxicity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Keywords
lenalidomide, rash, cutaneous adverse events, multiple myeloma, myelodysplastic syndrome, drug toxicity, incidence, adverse drug reactions
MeSH terms
Lenalidomide, Exanthema, Humans, Multiple Myeloma, Thalidomide, Incidence, Angiogenesis Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review