Cited by 648Multiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchBone health and treatments

Combination therapy with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (Rev/Dex) for newly diagnosed myeloma

Open access
Rajkumar, S. Vincent, Hayman, Suzanne R., Lacy, Martha Q., Dispenzieri, Angela, Geyer, Susan M., Kabat, Brian, Zeldenrust, Steven R., Kumar, Shaji +7 more·2005·Blood

Abstract

We report the results of a phase 2 trial using lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (Rev/Dex) as initial therapy for myeloma. Thirtyfour patients were enrolled. Lenalidomide was given orally 25 mg daily on days 1 to 21 of a 28-day cycle. Dexamethasone was given orally 40 mg daily on days 1 to 4, 9 to 12, and 17 to 20 of each cycle. Objective response was defined as a decrease in serum monoclonal protein level by 50% or greater and a decrease in urine M protein level by at least 90% or to a level less than 200 mg/24 hours, confirmed by 2 consecutive determinations at least 4 weeks apart. Thirty-one of 34 patients achieved an objective response, including 2 (6%) achieving complete response (CR) and 11 (32%) meeting criteria for both very good partial response and near complete response, resulting in an overall objective response rate of 91%. Of the 3 remaining patients not achieving an objective response, 2 had minor response (MR) and one had stable disease. Fortyseven percent of patients experienced grade III or higher nonhematologic toxicity, most commonly fatigue (15%), muscle weakness (6%), anxiety (6%), pneumonitis (6%), and rash (6%). Rev/Dex is a highly active regimen with manageable side effects in the treatment of newly diagnosed myeloma.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2005-07-2817

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Thalidomide maintenance increased complete remission rates (62% versus 43%; P<0.001) and event-free survival (56% versus 44% at 5 years; P=0.01), but produced no overall survival benefit (5-year OS about 65% in both groups; P=0.90).

    “Such maintenance therapy was first attempted with thalidomide, resulting in an increase in complete remission (CR) rates (62% versus 43% without maintenance; P <0.001) and an event-free survival (EFS) benefit (56% versus 44% at 5 years; P = 0.01), but no overall survival (OS) benefit (5-year OS ~65% in both groups; P = 0.90)32.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [10]Weber DM, Gavino M, Delasalle K, Rankin K, Giralt S, Alexanian R. Thalidomide alone or with dexamethasone for multiple myeloma [abstract]. Blood. 1999;94(suppl 1): 604a. Abstract 2686. [Google Scholar]
  2. [18]Richardson P, Jagannath S, Schlossman R, et al. A multi-center, randomized, phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 CDC-5013 dose regimens when used alone or in combination with dexamethasone (Dex) for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) [abstract]. Blood. 2003;102: 235a. Abstract 825. [Google Scholar]
  3. [20]Dimopoulos M, Weber D, Chen C, et al. Evaluating oral lenalidomide (Revlimid-) and dexamethasone versus placebo and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma [abstract]. Haematologica. 2005;90(suppl 2): 160. Abstract 0402. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rajkumar, S. V., Hayman, S. R., Lacy, M. Q., Dispenzieri, A., Geyer, S. M., Kabat, B., Zeldenrust, S. R., Kumar, S., Greipp, P. R., Fonseca, R., Lust, J. A., Russell, S. J., Kyle, R. A., Witzig, T. E., & Gertz, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • From the Divisions of Hematology and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ.
Venue
Blood
Published
2005-12-15
Volume
106
Issue
13
Pages
4050-4053
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2168929741
Cited by
648
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 39
FWCI
47.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Blood (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (CA10080, R01CA093842, CA 93842, R01CA107476)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
Keywords
lenalidomide, dexamethasone, multiple myeloma, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, combination therapy, initial treatment, objective response rate, complete response, non-hematologic toxicity, fatigue, pneumonitis, monoclonal protein
MeSH terms
Lenalidomide, Adult, Aged, Dexamethasone, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Hematologic Tests, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Myeloma, Thalidomide, Survival Rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review