Cited by 38Celiac Disease Research and ManagementConsumer Attitudes and Food LabelingEosinophilic Esophagitis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Can individuals with celiac disease identify gluten-free foods correctly?

Open access

Abstract

Background & aims Patients with celiac disease (CD) often report inadvertent gluten exposures and challenges reading labels. The most common cause of non-responsive CD is gluten exposure. We aimed to assess whether recently diagnosed CD patients can determine whether a food is gluten-free based on labeling, and to assess skills over time. A secondary aim was to identify factors associated with label reading proficiency. Methods Inception cohort with follow-up at 6, 12, and 24 months after diagnosis. Participants were asked to determine whether 25 food items were gluten-free based on labeling information. Diet adherence was assessed using the Celiac Diet Assessment Tool (CDAT) and the Gluten-Free Eating Assessment Tool (GF-EAT). 144 adults with newly diagnosed celiac disease were enrolled. The initial quiz at 6 months was completed by 83%. Quizzes were completed by 72% at 12 months and 70% at 24 months. Results Median overall accuracy scores were: 23/25, 24/25 and 21/25 at 6, 12 and 24 months respectively. Gluten-free products with explicit "gluten-free" claims had the fewest errors. Quiz scores were not correlated with tTG IgA levels, or CDAT or GF-EAT scores. Diet adherence was generally good (>85% with CDAT <13 suggesting adequate GFD adherence); however, at 24 months, only 11% reported no gluten exposure. Conclusions CD patients may be unable to consistently choose gluten-free foods based on product labeling. Explicit identification of gluten-free products may be helpful. Label reading ability appears stable over time. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether erroneous label reading or misleading labels are associated with persistent villous atrophy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.01.012

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Rubio-Tapia, 2013, ACG clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of celiac disease, Am J Gastroenterol, 108, 656, 10.1038/ajg.2013.79 · DOI
  2. Theethira, 2014, Nutritional consequences of celiac disease and the gluten-free diet, Expet Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 8, 123, 10.1586/17474124.2014.876360 · DOI
  3. Biagi, 2004, A milligram of gluten a day keeps the mucosal recovery away: a case report, Nutr Rev, 62, 360, 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2004.tb00062.x · DOI
  4. Leffler, 2007, Etiologies and predictors of diagnosis in nonresponsive celiac disease, Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 5, 445, 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.12.006 · DOI
  5. Ciacci, 2002, Long-term follow-up of celiac adults on gluten-free diet: prevalence and correlates of intestinal damage, Digestion, 66, 178, 10.1159/000066757 · DOI
  6. Haines, 2008, Systematic review: the evidence base for long-term management of coeliac disease, Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 28, 1042, 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03820.x · DOI
  7. White, 2016, Coeliac disease and the gluten-free diet: a review of the burdens; factors associated with adherence and impact on health-related quality of life, with specific focus on adolescence, J Hum Nutr Diet, 29, 593, 10.1111/jhn.12375 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Biagi, 2009, A gluten-free diet score to evaluate dietary compliance in patients with coeliac disease, Br J Nutr, 102, 882, 10.1017/S0007114509301579 · DOI
  9. Leffler, 2009, A simple validated gluten-free diet adherence survey for adults with celiac disease, Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 7
  10. Silvester, 2017, Tests for serum transglutaminase and endomysial antibodies do not detect most patients with celiac disease and persistent villous atrophy on gluten-free diets: a meta-analysis, Gastroenterology, 153, 689, 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.015 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Leffler, 2009, A validated disease-specific symptom index for adults with celiac disease, Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 7, 1328, 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.07.031 · DOI
  12. Silvester, 2016, Symptomatic suspected gluten exposure is common among patients with coeliac disease on a gluten-free diet, Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 44, 612, 10.1111/apt.13725 · DOI
  13. Madden, 2016, Outcomes in coeliac disease: a qualitative exploration of patients ’ views on what they want to achieve when seeing a dietitian, J Hum Nutr Diet, 29, 607, 10.1111/jhn.12378 · DOI
  14. Butterworth, 2004, Factors relating to compliance with a gluten-free diet in patients with coeliac disease: comparison of white Caucasian and South Asian patients, Clin Nutr, 23, 1127, 10.1016/j.clnu.2004.02.009 · DOI
  15. Muhammad, 2019, Identifying and improving adherence to the gluten-free diet in people with coeliac disease, Proc Nutr Soc, 1–8
  16. Muhammad, 2017, Adherence to a gluten free diet is associated with receiving gluten free foods on prescription and understanding food labelling, Nutrients, 9, 705, 10.3390/nu9070705 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Zysk, 2019, Role of front-of-package gluten-free product labeling in a pair-matched study in women with and without celiac disease on a gluten-free diet, Nutrients, 11, 398, 10.3390/nu11020398 · DOI
  18. Shepherd, 2012, Nutritional inadequacies of the gluten-free diet in both recently-diagnosed and long-term patients with coeliac disease, J Hum Nutr Diet, 26, 349, 10.1111/jhn.12018 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gutowski, E. D., Weiten, D., Green, K. H., Rigaux, L. N., Bernstein, C. N., Graff, L. A., Walker, J. R., Duerksen, D. R., & Silvester, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Winnipeg Regional Health Authority (CA)
  • St. Boniface Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Gutowski, Emily D.
  • Weiten, Dayna
  • Green, Kathy H.
  • Rigaux, Lisa N.
  • Bernstein, Charles N.
  • Graff, Lesley A.
  • Walker, John R.
  • Duerksen, Donald R.
  • Silvester, Jocelyn A.
Venue
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
36
Pages
82-90
ISSN
2405-4577 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3005746351
Cited by
38
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Nutrition ESPEN (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
  • National Institutes of Health (T32 DK 07760)
  • Manitoba Health Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Keywords
celiac disease, gluten-free diet, food labeling, dietary adherence, newly diagnosed celiac disease, gluten-free foods, villous atrophy
MeSH terms
Food Ingredients, Treatment Adherence and Compliance, Food Markets, Supermarkets, Adult, Celiac Disease, Female, Food Labeling, Glutens, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Nutrition Assessment, Diet, Gluten-Free

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review