Cited by 20Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeNutrition and Health StudiesNutrition and Health in Aging

A cost-utility analysis of multivitamin and multimineral supplements in men and women aged 65 years and over

Kilonzo, Mary M., Vale, Luke D., Cook, Jonathan A., Milne, Anne C., Stephen, Audrey I., Avenell, Alison·2007·Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background & aims As people age there is a progressive dysregulation of the immune system that may lead to an increased risk of infections, which may precipitate hospital admission in people with chronic heart or respiratory diseases. Mineral and vitamin supplementation in older people could therefore influence infections in older people. However, the evidence from the available randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is mixed. The aim of the study was to assess the relative efficiency of multivitamin and multimineral supplementation compared with no supplementation. Methods Cost-utility analysis alongside an RCT. Participants aged 65 years or over from six general practices in Grampian, Scotland, were studied. They were randomised to one tablet daily of either a multivitamin and multimineral supplement or matching placebo. Exclusion criteria were use of mineral, vitamin or fish oil supplements in the previous 3 months (1 month for water soluble vitamins), vitamin B12 injection in the last 3 months. Results Nine hundred and ten participants were recruited (454 placebo and 456 supplementation). Use of health service resources and costs were similar between the two groups. The supplementation arm was more costly although this was not statistically significant ( pound15 per person, 95% CI-3.75 to 34.95). After adjusting for minimisation and baseline EQ-5D scores supplementation was associated with fewer QALYs per person (-0.018, 95% CI-0.04 to 0.002). It was highly unlikely that sup…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clnu.2006.11.002

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In polymorbid medical inpatients exclusively fed orally, documented or suspected micronutrient deficiencies should be repleted.

    “In polymorbid medical inpatients exclusively fed orally, documented or suspected micronutrient deficiencies should be repleted.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kilonzo, M. M., Vale, L. D., Cook, J. A., Milne, A. C., Stephen, A. I., & Avenell, A.
Affiliations
University of Aberdeen (GB)
Venue
Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-06
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
364-370
ISSN
0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987384780
Cited by
20
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
multivitamin supplementation, older adults, cost-utility analysis, cost-effectiveness, quality-adjusted life years, health care costs, immune dysregulation, infection risk
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Infections, Male, Minerals, Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Nutritional Requirements, Vitamins, Infection Control, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review