Predictors for achieving protein and energy requirements in undernourished hospital patients
Abstract
Background & aims Providing sufficient protein an energy is considered crucial in the treatment of undernutrition. Still, the majority of undernourished hospital patients have a suboptimal protein and energy intake. The aim of this study was to investigate predictors for achieving protein and energy requirements on the fourth day of admission in undernourished hospitalized patients. Methods 830 adult undernourished patients (SNAQ ≥ 3) were retrospectively included. Intake requirements were defined as ≥1.2 g protein per kg bodyweight and ≥100% of the energy requirement based on calculated resting energy expenditure according to Harris & Benedict + 30%. Logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate predictors for achieving the requirements. Results Protein and energy intake had been recorded for 610 patients, of whom 25.6% had sufficient protein and energy intake. Protein requirements were less commonly met than energy requirements. Complete case analyses (n = 575) showed that negative predictors for achieving the protein and energy requirements were: nausea (OR = 0.18; 95%CI = 0.06-0.53), cancer (0.57; 0.35-0.93), acute infections (0.63; 0.37-1.01) and higher BMI (0.84; 0.79-0.89). Positive predictors were: a higher age (1.01; 1.00-1.03), chronic lung disease (3.76; 2.33-6.07) and receiving tube feeding (3.89; 1.56-9.73). Conclusion Only one in four undernourished hospital patients meets the predefined protein and energy requirements on the fourth day of admission. Nausea, cancer, acute infections, BMI, age, chronic lung disease and tube feeding were identified as predictors for achieving protein and energy intake.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a retrospective study of undernourished older people in a Dutch hospital (n = 610), only 28% met protein targets (n = 172).
“Results of a retrospective study of undernourished older people in a Dutch hospital (n ¼ 610) showed that only 28% met protein targets (n ¼ 172).78”
From Evidence-Based Recommendations for Optimal Dietary Protein Intake in Older People: A Position Paper From the PROT-AGE Study Group (2013) · cites this paper as [78]
In that study, 15% of screened patients were malnourished and included; 40% of patients older than 65 had multiple diseases.
“Of those screened, 15% were malnourished and included in the study; 40% of patients older than 65 had multiple diseases.”
From Evidence-Based Recommendations for Optimal Dietary Protein Intake in Older People: A Position Paper From the PROT-AGE Study Group (2013) · cites this paper as [78]
Cites
The Harris Benedict equation reevaluated: resting energy requirements and the body cell mass
Roza, A. M., & Shizgal, H. M. (1984) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/40.1.168 · Cited by 824 · see citing works
Optimal protein requirements during the first 2 weeks after the onset of critical illness
Ishibashi, N., Plank, L. D., Sando, K., & Hill, G. L. (1998) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/00003246-199809000-00020 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bauer, J., Biolo, G., Cederholm, T., Cesari, M., Cruz-Jentoft, A. J., Morley, J. E., Phillips, S., Sieber, C., Stehle, P., Teta, D., et al. (2013) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.05.021 · Cited by 2,553 · see citing works
- Authors
- Leistra, E., Willeboordse, F., van Bokhorst - de van der Schueren, M. A. E., Visser, M., Weijs, P. J. M., Haans - van den Oord, A., Oostenbrink, J., Evers, A. M., & Kruizenga, H. M.
- Affiliations
- Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
- Venue
- Clinical Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 484-489
- ISSN
- 0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2138696019
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
- Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
- Keywords
- malnutrition, hospitalized patients, protein intake, energy intake, protein requirements, energy requirements, nausea, cancer, acute infection, body mass index, chronic lung disease, tube feeding, Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Energy Intake, Dietary Proteins, Energy Metabolism, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Middle Aged, Nutritional Requirements, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Body Mass Index, Logistic Models, Malnutrition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review