Trajectories of protein intake and 28-day mortality in critically ill patients: a secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background & aims The optimal protein intake approach during the early phase of critical illness remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the association between different trajectories of protein intake and 28-day mortality in a cohort of critically ill patients. Methods The NEED trial is a multicenter, cluster-randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of an actively implemented evidence-based nutrition guideline on mortality in critically ill patients. This secondary analysis included the patients who stayed in ICU for at least seven days. Group-based trajectory modeling was applied to identify subgroups with similar protein intake trajectories in this cohort. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the impact of different trajectories on 28-day mortality. Results Overall, 2191 patients were included for analysis. A distinct triple-group trajectory of protein intake was identified, with 919 patients categorized into the low-level protein intake group, 1146 the medium-level group, and 126 the high-level group. The mean daily protein intake from the low-to high-level protein intake group during the first week of enrollment were 0.38 ± 0.14, 0.8 ± 0.18, and 1.68 ± 0.39 g/kg/d, respectively. Compared with the medium-level protein intake group, the low-level or high-level protein intake group was associated with significantly increased 28-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.348, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.067-1.704; HR = 2.291, 95% CI: 1.533-3.423, respectively). After controlling for potential confounders, the adjusted HRs were 1.365 (95% CI: 1.032-1.807) for the low-level group and 1.921 (95% CI: 1.274-2.896) for the high-level group. However, when taking energy intake into account, low-level protein intake was no longer related to mortality. In contrast, the detrimental effects of high-level protein intake remain tenable (Adjusted HR = 2.324, 95% CI: 1.524-3.543, P < 0.001). Conclusions Low-level or high-level protein intake in the early phase of critical illness was associated with increased 28-day mortality than medium-level protein intake. However, when adjusted for energy intake, low-level protein intake in the early phase was no longer associated with increased 28-day mortality.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Medium doses (not low and not high) are associated with the best outcomes.
“Medium doses (not low and not high) are associated with the best outcomes [61].”
From ESPEN practical and partially revised guideline: Clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit (2023) · cites this paper as [61]
Cites
ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit.
Singer, P., Blaser, A. R., Berger, M. M., Alhazzani, W., Calder, P. C., Casaer, M. P., Hiesmayr, M., Mayer, K., Montejo, J. C., Pichard, C., et al. (2019) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2018.08.037 · Cited by 2,904 · see citing works
Early versus late parenteral nutrition in critically ill adults
Casaer, M. P., Mesotten, D., Hermans, G., Wouters, P. J., Schetz, M., Meyfroidt, G., Van Cromphaut, S., Ingels, C., Meersseman, P., Muller, J., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1102662 · Cited by 1,696 · see citing works
Negative impact of hypocaloric feeding and energy balance on clinical outcome in ICU patients
Villet, S., Chiolero, R. L., Bollmann, M. D., Revelly, J.-P., Cayeux RN, M.-C., Delarue, J., & Berger, M. M. (2005) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2005.03.006 · Cited by 995 · see citing works
Provision of protein and energy in relation to measured requirements in intensive care patients
Allingstrup, M. J., Esmailzadeh, N., Wilkens Knudsen, A., Espersen, K., Hartvig Jensen, T., Wiis, J., Perner, A., & Kondrup, J. (2012) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2011.12.006 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Weijs, P. J., Looijaard, W. G., Beishuizen, A., Girbes, A. R., & Oudemans-van Straaten, H. M. (2014) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/s13054-014-0701-z · Cited by 358 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ESPEN practical and partially revised guideline: Clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit
Singer, P., Blaser, A. R., Berger, M. M., Calder, P. C., Casaer, M., Hiesmayr, M., Mayer, K., Montejo-Gonzalez, J. C., Pichard, C., Preiser, J.-C., et al. (2023) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2023.07.011 · Cited by 793 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lin, J., Chen, W., Ye, X., Lv, C., Liu, Y., Jiang, X., Tong, Z., Liu, Y., Ke, L., Li, W., & Li, J.
- Affiliations
- Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command (CN)
- Nanjing Medical University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Ke, Lu
- Li, Jieshou
- Venue
- Clinical Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-08
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1644-1650
- ISSN
- 0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4281690525
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 2.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (82070665, ISRCTN12233792, 22017NZKY-019-02)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
- Keywords
- protein intake, critically ill patients, 28-day mortality, intensive care nutrition, high-protein diet, energy intake, group-based trajectory modeling, critically ill pregnant women
- MeSH terms
- Energy Intake, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Cohort Studies, Proportional Hazards Models, Critical Illness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review