Cited by 275Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchWomen's cancer prevention and managementReproductive tract infections research

Which high-risk HPV assays fulfil criteria for use in primary cervical cancer screening?

Open access
Arbyn, M., Snijders, P.J.F., Meijer, C.J.L.M., Berkhof, J., Cuschieri, K., Kocjan, B.J., Poljak, M.·2015·Clinical Microbiology and Infection

Abstract

Several countries are in the process of switching to high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing for cervical cancer screening. Given the multitude of available tests, validated assays which assure high-quality screening need to be identified. A systematic review was conducted to answer the question which hrHPV tests fulfil the criteria defined by an international expert team in 2009, based on reproducibility and relative sensitivity and specificity compared to Hybrid Capture-2 or GP5+/6+ PCR-enzyme immunoassay. These latter two hrHPV DNA assays were validated in large randomized trials and cohorts with a follow-up duration of 8 years or more. Eligible studies citing the 2009 guideline were retrieved from Scopus (http://www.scopus.com) and from a meta-analysis assessing the relative accuracy of new hrHPV assays versus the standard comparator tests to detect high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer in primary screening. The cobas 4800 HPV test and Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV test were consistently validated in two and three studies, respectively, whereas the PapilloCheck HPV-screening test, BD Onclarity HPV assay and the HPV-Risk assay were validated each in one study. Other tests which partially fulfil the 2009 guidelines are the following: Cervista HPV HR Test, GP5+/6+ PCR-LMNX, an in-house E6/E7 RT quantitative PCR and MALDI-TOF (matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization time-of-flight). The APTIMA HPV assay targeting E6/E7 mRNA of hrHPV was also fully…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.04.015

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arbyn, M., Snijders, P. J. F., Meijer, C. J. L. M., Berkhof, J., Cuschieri, K., Kocjan, B. J., & Poljak, M.
Affiliations
  • Institut Scientifique de Santé Publique (BE)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Edinburgh Royal Infirmary (GB)
  • University of Ljubljana (SI)
Corresponding author
Arbyn, M.
Venue
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
21
Issue
9
Pages
817-826
ISSN
1198-743X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998567451
Cited by
275
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 17
FWCI
29.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Microbiology and Infection (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
high-risk HPV testing, cervical cancer screening, assay validation, Hybrid Capture 2, Cobas 4800 HPV test, Aptima HPV assay, E6/E7 mRNA, high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, assay sensitivity and specificity, MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, screening frequency
MeSH terms
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Molecular Diagnostic Techniques, Papillomaviridae, Early Detection of Cancer, Genotyping Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review