Cited by 28Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies

Comparison of checking behavior in adults with or without checking symptom of obsessive-compulsive disorder using a novel computer-based measure

Open access
Kim, Kwanguk, Roh, Daeyoung, Kim, Chan-Hyung, Cha, Kyung Ryeol, Rosenthal, M. Zachary, Kim, Sun I.·2012·Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Abstract

Easy to administer behavioral measures of checking are needed to improve the assessment of this hallmark feature of OCD. We recently developed a new computer-based behavioral assessment of OCD in a previous study. As a follow-up experiment for this method, the goal of this study was to examine whether the new computer-based behavioral assessment would be capable of differentiating behaviors in adults with OCD characterized by checking behavior from those without checking behavior. We compared 22 OCD patients with compulsive checking behaviors (OCD checkers), 17 OCD controls without checking behavior (OCD controls), and 31 healthy controls (HCs) on a novel computer-based behavioral measure of checking behavior. Despite similar levels of successfully completed tasks, OCD checkers demonstrated longer duration of checking behaviors than OCD controls or HCs. Interestingly, no differences were found between OCD controls and HCs in any of the dependent variables. Our new behavioral measure offers a novel, objective, and ecologically valid measure of checking behaviors in a sample of adults with OCD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.03.014

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, K., Roh, D., Kim, C.-H., Cha, K. R., Rosenthal, M. Z., & Kim, S. I.
Affiliations
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • Osong Medical Innovation Foundation (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Sun I.
Venue
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
108
Issue
1
Pages
434-441
ISSN
0169-2607 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133506828
Cited by
28
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Korea government (MEST) (2010-0000390)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, checking behavior, compulsive checking, behavioral measures
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Humans, Obsessive Behavior, User-Computer Interface

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review