Cited by 74Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsAI in cancer detection

Psoriasis skin biopsy image segmentation using Deep Convolutional Neural Network

Pal, Anabik, Garain, Utpal, Chandra, Aditi, Chatterjee, Raghunath, Senapati, Swapan·2018·Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Abstract

Background and objective Development of machine assisted tools for automatic analysis of psoriasis skin biopsy image plays an important role in clinical assistance. Development of automatic approach for accurate segmentation of psoriasis skin biopsy image is the initial prerequisite for developing such system. However, the complex cellular structure, presence of imaging artifacts, uneven staining variation make the task challenging. This paper presents a pioneering attempt for automatic segmentation of psoriasis skin biopsy images.Methods Several deep neural architectures are tried for segmenting psoriasis skin biopsy images. Deep models are used for classifying the super-pixels generated by Simple Linear Iterative Clustering (SLIC) and the segmentation performance of these architectures is compared with the traditional hand-crafted feature based classifiers built on popularly used classifiers like K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest (RF). A U-shaped Fully Convolutional Neural Network (FCN) is also used in an end to end learning fashion where input is the original color image and the output is the segmentation class map for the skin layers.Results An annotated real psoriasis skin biopsy image data set of ninety (90) images is developed and used for this research. The segmentation performance is evaluated with two metrics namely, Jaccard's Coefficient (JC) and the Ratio of Correct Pixel Classification (RCPC) accuracy. The experimental results show that the CNN based approaches outperform the traditional hand-crafted feature based classification approaches.Conclusions The present research shows that practical system can be developed for machine assisted analysis of psoriasis disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.01.027

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pal, A., Garain, U., Chandra, A., Chatterjee, R., & Senapati, S.
Affiliations
Indian Statistical Institute (IN)
Corresponding author
Pal, Anabik
Venue
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
159
Pages
59-69
ISSN
0169-2607 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2794251468
Cited by
74
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
Keywords
psoriasis, image segmentation, deep convolutional neural networks, superpixel classification, SLIC, fully convolutional network
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Biopsy, Color, Epidermis, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Psoriasis, Skin, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Statistical, Cluster Analysis, Databases, Factual, Neural Networks, Computer, Dermis, Support Vector Machine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review