Cited by 22Medical Image Segmentation Techniques3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics

Iterative Closest Graph Matching for Non-rigid 3d/2d Coronary Arteries Registration

Zhu, Jianjun, Li, Heng, Ai, Danni, Yang, Qi, Fan, Jingfan, Huang, Yong, Song, Hong, Han, Yechen +1 more·2021·Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Abstract

Background and objective Fusion of the preoperative computed tomography angiography and intraoperative X-ray angiography images can considerably enhance the visual perception of physicians during percutaneous coronary interventions. This technique can provide 3D information of the arteries and reduce the uncertainty of 2D guidance images. For this purpose, 3D/2D vascular registration with high accuracy and robustness is crucial for performing accurate surgery. Methods In this study, we propose an iterative closest graph matching (ICGM) method that utilizes an alternative iteration framework including correspondence and transformation phases. A coarse-to-fine matching approach based on redundant graph matching is proposed for the correspondence phase. The transformation phase involves rigid and non-rigid transformations, in which rigid transformation is calculated using a closed-form solution, and non-rigid transformation is achieved using a statistical shape model established from a synthetic deformation dataset. Results The proposed method is evaluated and compared with nine state-of-the-art methods on simulated data and clinical datasets. Experiments demonstrate that our method is insensitive to the pose of data and robust to noise and deformation. Moreover, it outperforms other methods in terms of registering real data. Conclusions Given its high capture range, the proposed method can register 3D vessels without prior initialization in clinical practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105901

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, J., Li, H., Ai, D., Yang, Q., Fan, J., Huang, Y., Song, H., Han, Y., & Yang, J.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Institute of Technology (CN)
  • Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Ai, Danni
  • Yang, Jian
Venue
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
199
Pages
105901
ISSN
0169-2607 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3116473899
Cited by
22
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science and Technology Major Project of China (2018ZX10723-204-008)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Keywords
2D-3D registration, coronary arteries, non-rigid registration, CT angiography, X-ray angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention, statistical shape models, rigid transformation
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Angiography, Coronary Vessels, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review