Iterative Closest Graph Matching for Non-rigid 3d/2d Coronary Arteries Registration
Abstract
Background and objective Fusion of the preoperative computed tomography angiography and intraoperative X-ray angiography images can considerably enhance the visual perception of physicians during percutaneous coronary interventions. This technique can provide 3D information of the arteries and reduce the uncertainty of 2D guidance images. For this purpose, 3D/2D vascular registration with high accuracy and robustness is crucial for performing accurate surgery. Methods In this study, we propose an iterative closest graph matching (ICGM) method that utilizes an alternative iteration framework including correspondence and transformation phases. A coarse-to-fine matching approach based on redundant graph matching is proposed for the correspondence phase. The transformation phase involves rigid and non-rigid transformations, in which rigid transformation is calculated using a closed-form solution, and non-rigid transformation is achieved using a statistical shape model established from a synthetic deformation dataset. Results The proposed method is evaluated and compared with nine state-of-the-art methods on simulated data and clinical datasets. Experiments demonstrate that our method is insensitive to the pose of data and robust to noise and deformation. Moreover, it outperforms other methods in terms of registering real data. Conclusions Given its high capture range, the proposed method can register 3D vessels without prior initialization in clinical practice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Although statistical modeling techniques exist to limit the parameter search space, registration accuracy and sensitivity to key features remain an area of concern.
“Although statistical modeling techniques exist to limit the parameter search space, the registration accuracy and sensitivity to key features remain an area of concern (Zhu et al., 2021).”
From The Impact of Machine Learning on 2D/3D Registration for Image-Guided Interventions: A Systematic Review and Perspective (2021) · cites this paper as Zhu et al., 2021
Cites
A CNN Regression Approach for Real-Time 2D/3D Registration
Miao, S., Wang, Z. J., & Liao, R. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2521800 · Cited by 514 · see citing works
Dilated FCN for Multi-Agent 2D/3D Medical Image Registration
Miao, S., Piat, S., Fischer, P., Tuysuzoglu, A., Mewes, P., Mansi, T., & Liao, R. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11576 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
GPU Accelerated Generation of Digitally Reconstructed Radiographs for 2-D/3-D Image Registration
Dorgham, O. M., Laycock, S. D., & Fisher, M. H. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2012.2207898 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Fully automated 2D–3D registration and verification
Varnavas, A., Carrell, T., & Penney, G. (2015) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2015.08.005 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Unberath, M., Gao, C., Hu, Y., Judish, M., Taylor, R. H., Armand, M., & Grupp, R. (2021) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2021.716007 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Naik, R. R., Hoblidar, A., Bhat, S. N., Ampar, N., & Kundangar, R. (2022) · Journal of Imaging · doi:10.3390/jimaging8070185 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhu, J., Li, H., Ai, D., Yang, Q., Fan, J., Huang, Y., Song, H., Han, Y., & Yang, J.
- Affiliations
- Beijing Institute of Technology (CN)
- Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Ai, Danni
- Yang, Jian
- Venue
- Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-02
- Volume
- 199
- Pages
- 105901
- ISSN
- 0169-2607 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3116473899
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science and Technology Major Project of China (2018ZX10723-204-008)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- 2D-3D registration, coronary arteries, non-rigid registration, CT angiography, X-ray angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention, statistical shape models, rigid transformation
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Angiography, Coronary Vessels, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Imaging, Three-Dimensional
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review