Cited by 17Spinal Fractures and Fixation TechniquesMedical Imaging and AnalysisMedical Image Segmentation Techniques

A Hybrid 3D-2D Image Registration Framework for Pedicle Screw Trajectory Registration between Intraoperative X-ray Image and Preoperative CT Image

Open access
Naik, Roshan Ramakrishna, Hoblidar, Anitha, Bhat, Shyamasunder N., Ampar, Nishanth, Kundangar, Raghuraj·2022·Journal of Imaging

Abstract

Pedicle screw insertion is considered a complex surgery among Orthopaedics surgeons. Exclusively to prevent postoperative complications associated with pedicle screw insertion, various types of image intensity registration-based navigation systems have been developed. These systems are computation-intensive, have a small capture range and have local maxima issues. On the other hand, deep learning-based techniques lack registration generalizability and have data dependency. To overcome these limitations, a patient-specific hybrid 3D-2D registration principled framework was designed to map a pedicle screw trajectory between intraoperative X-ray image and preoperative CT image. An anatomical landmark-based 3D-2D Iterative Control Point (ICP) registration was performed to register a pedicular marker pose between the X-ray images and axial preoperative CT images. The registration framework was clinically validated by generating projection images possessing an optimal match with intraoperative X-ray images at the corresponding control point registration. The effectiveness of the registered trajectory was evaluated in terms of displacement and directional errors after reprojecting its position on 2D radiographic planes. The mean Euclidean distances for the Head and Tail end of the reprojected trajectory from the actual trajectory in the AP and lateral planes were shown to be 0.6–0.8 mm and 0.5–1.6 mm, respectively. Similarly, the corresponding mean directional errors were found to be 4.90 and 20. The mean trajectory length difference between the actual and registered trajectory was shown to be 2.67 mm. The approximate time required in the intraoperative environment to axially map the marker position for a single vertebra was found to be 3 min. Utilizing the markerless registration techniques, the designed framework functions like a screw navigation tool, and assures the quality of surgery being performed by limiting the need of postoperative CT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jimaging8070185

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Registration of intraoperative 2D X-rays to 3D preoperative scans is a prerequisite for numerous advanced image guidance techniques, including vertebral level localization, surgical plan reprojection, instrument tracking, motion correction, and surgical robotics.

    “The registration of intraoperative 2D X-rays to 3D preoperative scans is a prerequisite for numerous advanced image guidance techniques, including vertebral level localization [11], surgical plan reprojection [12,13], instrument tracking [14], motion correction [15], and surgical robotics [16].”

    From Rapid patient-specific neural networks for intraoperative X-ray to volume registration (2025) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Literature Survey (§2.3; page unavailable) says some robot-assisted surgery systems integrate with 2D fluoroscopic devices, while most use optical cameras for tracking. The Introduction describes 3D–2D registration for surgical navigation, but the paper does not establish registration of intraoperative X-rays to preoperative scans as a prerequisite for surgical robotics—the part attributed to this source by citation [16]. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Segmentation labels are relatively easy to derive for most structures on CT and MRI thanks to open-source tools such as TotalSegmentator or MOOSE, but other structures like vessels remain difficult to segment.

    “While segmentation labels are relatively easy to derive for most structures on CT and MRI thanks to open-source tools such as TotalSegmentator [12] or MOOSE [13,14], other structures like vessels remain difficult to segment.”

    From Rapid patient-specific neural networks for intraoperative X-ray to volume registration (2025) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Materials and Methods section describes registration between preoperative CT and intraoperative X-rays, not an open-source CT or MRI segmentation tool. The Literature Survey mentions cerebral vessels in the context of registration, but does not discuss whether they are difficult to segment. Searches for MOOSE, segmentation labels, and vessel segmentation found no passage addressing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [1]Azar F.M. Canale S.T. Beaty J.H. Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics E-Book Elsevier Health Sciences New York, NY, USA 2020
  2. [7]Abrah ao G.S. Rosa R.C. Okubo R. Shimano A.C. Effect of the pilot hole preparation on the anchorage of pedicle screws Acta Ortop. Bras. 2012 20 274 279 24453617 PMC3718444
  3. [17]Ripka P. Tipek A. Modern Sensors Handbook John Wiley & Sons Hoboken, NJ, USA 2013
  4. [47]Li Z. Zhang Q. A simple yet efficient rank one update for covariance matrix adaptation arXiv 2017 1710.03996

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naik, R. R., Hoblidar, A., Bhat, S. N., Ampar, N., & Kundangar, R.
Affiliations
  • Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN)
  • Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education Manipal, Manipal 576104, India
Corresponding author
Bhat, Shyamasunder N.
Venue
Journal of Imaging
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-07-06
Volume
8
Issue
7
Pages
185
ISSN
2313-433X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283833779
Cited by
16
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Imaging (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Science and Engineering Board (SERB) (EMR/2017/004742)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Keywords
pedicle screw navigation, preoperative CT, iterative closest point, markerless registration, spinal surgery, directional error

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review