CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 117Social and Intergroup PsychologyPopulism, Right-Wing MovementsSocial Movements and Cultural Identity

Ideology and the promotion of social change

Becker, Julia C·2020·Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
DOI 10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.10.005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.10.005

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals who identify as more liberal and endorse more leftist attitudes place a higher value on equality and progressive forms of social change than those who identify as more conservative and rightist.

    “By contrast, those who identify as more liberal and endorse more leftist attitudes place a higher value on equality and progressive forms of social change43,47,82,107,171–173.”

    From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [172]

  • Individuals who identify as more conservative and endorse more rightist attitudes place a higher value on tradition, social order and stability, and the maintenance of existing hierarchical social arrangements than those who identify as more liberal and leftist.

    “those who identify as more conservative and endorse more rightist attitudes place a higher value on tradition, social order and stability, and the maintenance of existing hierarchical social arrangements.”

    From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [172]

  • Liberal-leftists are more willing to challenge the societal status quo and push for egalitarian forms of social change, whereas conservative-rightists are more authoritarian and more protective of cultural traditions as well as longstanding social, economic and political institutions.

    “Whereas liberal-leftists are more willing to challenge the societal status quo and push for egalitarian forms of social change, conservative-rightists are more authoritarian and more protective of cultural traditions as well as longstanding social, economic and political institutions101,107,149,166,168,172.”

    From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [172]

  • There are meaningful ideological asymmetries in democratic tolerance and other key outcomes.

    “Finally, when it comes to democratic tolerance and other key outcomes, there are meaningful ideological asymmetries that should not be ignored.”

    From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [172]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Becker, J. C.
Affiliations
Osnabrück University (DE)
Corresponding author
Becker, Julia C
ORCID
Becker, Julia C
Venue
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
34
Pages
6-11
ISSN
2352-1546 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.10.005
OpenAlex
W3003477107
Cited by
117
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Movements and Cultural Identity
Keywords
ideology, social change, collective action, political conservatism, political liberalism, right-wing populism, progressive social change, socio-political issues

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review