The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Calendar aging of commercial Li-ion cells of different chemistries – A review
Open accessAbstract
Summary In the past twenty years, intensive experimental and modeling efforts have been carried out to access and predict the life expectancy of lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries under calendar aging conditions. Aging studies are time intensive and usually only focus on one or two chemistries and a few aging conditions. They are therefore not providing a complete understanding of the entire range of temperatures and state of charges. This review is constructed from a comprehensive survey on the Li-ion calendar aging research from the past twenty years. It is the first effort at this scale that provides quantitative and comparative analyses on the aging behaviors of commercially available Li-ion batteries with different cathode and anode chemistries. The results presented in this review can be used to guide future aging studies to fill current knowledge gaps, and can also be used to make an informed selection on Li-ion chemistries for intended applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Calendar Aging of Lithium-Ion Batteries: I. Impact of the Graphite Anode on Capacity Fade
Keil, P., Schuster, S. F., Wilhelm, J., Travi, J., Hauser, A., Karl, R. C., & Jossen, A. (2016) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/2.0411609jes · Cited by 669
Dubarry, M., Svoboda, V., Hwu, R., & Yann Liaw, B. (2006) · Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters · doi:10.1149/1.2221767 · Cited by 427
Self-citationSarasketa-Zabala, E., Gandiaga, I., Rodriguez-Martinez, L. M., & Villarreal, I. (2014) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.08.051 · Cited by 293
Prada, E., Di Domenico, D., Creff, Y., Bernard, J., Sauvant-Moynot, V., & Huet, F. (2013) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/2.053304jes · Cited by 242
Cited by
Harlow, J. E., Ma, X., Li, J., Logan, E., Liu, Y., Zhang, N., Ma, L., Glazier, S. L., Cormier, M. M. E., Genovese, M., et al. (2019) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/2.0981913jes · Cited by 445
Hu, W., Peng, Y., Wei, Y., & Yang, Y. (2023) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c00033 · Cited by 429
Liu, K., Li, Y., Hu, X., Lucu, M., & Widanage, W. D. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2019.2941747 · Cited by 384
Corrosion of lithium metal anodes during calendar ageing and its microscopic origins
Boyle, D. T., Huang, W., Wang, H., Li, Y., Chen, H., Yu, Z., Zhang, W., Bao, Z., & Cui, Y. (2021) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-021-00787-9 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Dubarry, M., Qin, N., & Brooker, P.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Electrochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 106-113
- ISSN
- 2451-9103 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2808441473
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 4
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Calendar aging of commercial Li-ion cells of different chemistries – A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.coelec.2018.05.023
- The paper
- Dubarry, M., Qin, N., & Brooker, P. (2018). Calendar aging of commercial Li-ion cells of different chemistries – A review. Current Opinion in Electrochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coelec.2018.05.023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
